Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr. Saeed Assadi who wrote (37833)	9/30/1998 1:09:00 PM
From: StockMan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1570724

Re -- should share the blame of not providing Win-98 How do you know that the problem does not happen on Win98 because Win98 may be MASKING it?

To: Dr. Saeed Assadi who wrote (37833)	9/30/1998 2:47:00 PM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570724

Dr. Saeed, Re: "I am not a defender of AMD ... How come we still see win-95 shipped to the poor consumer?" At times Dr. Saeed, you sound a little defensive of AMD ... In regards to the "poor consumer", AMD has targeted their CPU's for the low end market. This means that systems will be sold for the lowest cost ... I am not surprised that some vendors to reduce cost are using Win95 as the operating system. If I had a 350mhz K6-2 with this problem, I would be very upset with AMD because they knew about this problem prior to my purchase AND now I have to pay to get this fixed ... Not a good way to do business, IMHO. Make It So, Yousef