Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Ben Ezra Weinstein (BNEZ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jud who wrote (3134)	10/3/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: The Street	Respond to of 9391

Agree- but reverses are not all bad. This, IMHO, looks like a good one.

To: Jud who wrote (3134)	10/3/1998 2:46:00 PM
From: Leroyt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9391

Jud, From the press release for the reverse split, it was stated that the RS was done to facilitate the acquisitions. To me, that means that the shares would have exceeded the outstanding shares. So how much would it exceed the shares and did Jack and Mikey increase their holdings? We'll just have to wait on company financials. But even if the pre-split share count went to 70 million (high I would say) the total OS would only be 6 million. I still don't know of any contribution to the float so the float might be as low as 1.5 million while the restricted and insider shares might be 4.5 million. Who knows. And I do get tired of speculating. There are TWO large variables in the analysis and we will HAVE to wait on both: 1. Outstanding shares and 2. Sales of PMA. Until those are know, it's an awful lot of guesswork. later, leroyt

To: Jud who wrote (3134)	10/3/1998 3:44:00 PM
From: Leroyt	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 9391

I have read the posts by all and have the following comments: 1. DIVIDEND: The dividend was announced in a July (I believe) PR. I will post it if anyone would like (it's at my office so it'll have to wait until Monday. If you were an owner of BNEZ at the time of the dividend, and HAVE NOT received your dividend, PRESS YOUR BROKER to find out WHY NOT! This will put pressure on the MM's and the company to resolve this situation. I did not own shares at the time of the dividend (unfortunately). 2. 506 Shares: I think otcbb talked about this. Whoever it was, PLEASE explain what you know about the BNEZ 506. When was it done? How many shares? And also, try to explain in clear terms what type of stock a 506 creates and exactly how are they restricted. I will discuss this issue with an attorney next week so I understand the details more. Thanks to all and I appreciate the constructive discussion. BTW, let's assume Jack and Mike added $400k at 0.10 (minimum price) and I thought the 1 million preferred (Sept. 1997) converted to 1.5 million common. That's a total of 5.5 million shares which may have been used to kept control when an equivalent number of shares were issued to the new acquisitions. But then the new share would be 11 million and then... I have year end financials for Sept. 1997 and the sharecount increased over the previous 3 months (as I recall) which may have been done to compensate employees. Perhaps we should use that as a regular interval addition. I think it was on the order of 2 million shares for a quater. So, if we add another 10 million shares for 5 quarters we may be getting close to the number. Also, I would think Dr. Clark would get paid in both cash and shares. Any comments??