SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Xylan -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gbh who wrote (2602)10/13/1998 11:27:00 AM
From: Tim Luke  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 4135
 
if you own this stock why are you so negative?? isn't that like shooting yourself in the foot.......very odd



To: gbh who wrote (2602)10/13/1998 12:00:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd  Respond to of 4135
 
Gary: You raise an interesting point that I mentioned here or over at Yahoo. LU has gone upstream of XYLN and now can now control XYLN's switches or as you point out develop there own. This is not a positive. Let us hope that XYLN has other tricks up their sleeve and can move products to market faster than LU et al or there is really no reason for a small comapny like this to hang around.

JFD

P.S. Off topic:https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=6000170



To: gbh who wrote (2602)10/13/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: drdan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4135
 
Gary, I must disagree with your assessment....you make it sound as if xyln chased after qudt to incorporate their software. It sounds to me, though, according to the qudt VP who was quoted in the article, that qudt wanted xyln to help them "broaden our distribution through OEM channels" with their QiP product.
Sounds to me as if they chose xyln specifically.






HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News