Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : and there was no one left to speak for me -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: INFO_DART who wrote (256)	10/13/1998 5:53:00 PM
From: Len	Respond to of 276

Wow, you have had two weeks to simmer, and this is what you come up with? Please, YOU AS THE VICTIM???? You must be delusional. Trying to take it to the coffee shop? Who brought ME up in this thread, and asked for the conflict? And who harassses who, now, by bringing my name into it again? How do you miss your own rhetoric, and hypocrisy? A campaign? Hardly.... I only answer posts to or about me in this thread. Is that your version of truth again? I give you no more time. Keep slinging it, and showing the world your shortcomings. Obfuscate by changing the subject to your delight. Let us see how many people warm to your version of what is proper discourse. Perhaps you can mention again to Bob, how his "..comments are always welcome here." As if you were the arbiter as to who is welcome. He is the Admin guy, in case you forgot. You are so silly as to indeed strain credulity. Good luck, ID. Try finding, or buying a personality. And please, save us from ourselves. Improve the discourse here at SI. Your perceived mission from God is clear. Len

To: INFO_DART who wrote (256)	10/13/1998 7:35:00 PM
From: William W. Dwyer, Jr.	Respond to of 276

Oh, Info Dart, you are back! What a delight. We missed you (not)! You were terminated by S.I. for multiple and flagrant violations of their Terms of Use. Then, S.I. Bob was nice enough to forgive your transgressions and allow you to return. Did you learn to mind your manners yet? No. Obviously not. You continue to drag up old stuff, distorting facts already reviewed, questioning decisions already made, continuing to engage me and Len in needless controversy. The members here deserve better. S.I. is for serious topics related to the stock market and trading activities. You very rarely even mention stocks. You only bring adversity and distract us all by your constant attempts to create controversy where none exists. Isn't it amazing how well we all got along during your absence? No one missed you, I.D. You were forgotten within a day. I knew you were back and I was afraid you would continue with your crap because I could tell the kind of person you were. I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, though, and I planned to never engage with you again. I wanted nothing more to do with you, as I consider you a worthless pest with nothing to contribute. However, you continue to discuss me, using my name in a slanderous and unnecessary way, distorting facts in which no one is really interested. Your purpose is obvious and clear to all. You intend to continue disrupting those of us who come here for legitimate purposes. But you cannot continue to harass and defame me. I will not tolerate it and S.I. will not tolerate it. You know that. Remember when you created a new thread, containing the unauthorized and inappropriate use of my name, which thread was specifically intended to encourage hostility and abuse be directed directly at me? Yes, of course you do. That is what got you terminated last time. You deserved it, and you got it. It's as simple as that. Now, it appears that you are back and asking for another administrative sanction by those in charge here. I know it will occur, and I know it will be sooner rather than later. You need to be keenly aware, though, that I will take serious legal action against you at the very first sign of any defamation by you toward me. I have the resources and experience, and it will be done. That is a fact. You do not want to deal with me outside of S.I. Trust me. So, go ahead and play your little games. I will be patiently waiting and watching, and then you will pay a heavy price for your pitiful actions. This is the only warning you will receive from me. Do not use my name ever again in any post on S.I. Also, do not ever send me a private message. Do either of these things, and I shall have immediate and perfect cause to request further sanctions against you. And, next time, I do not believe S.I. Bob will feel quite so tolerant of you. You have wasted enough of his time and ours. Be smart. Take this warning and leave me alone. If you want to be a member, just be a member. Do something constructive, if you can. But do NOT do anything with or about me. Violate this request and you will pay the price. It couldn't be any simpler than that.

To: INFO_DART who wrote (256)	10/13/1998 9:28:00 PM
From: INFO_DART	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 276

I've recreated the thread topic referenced by the post to which this is a reply. Here it is: Subject 23262

To: INFO_DART who wrote (256)	10/15/1998 11:34:00 PM
From: INFO_DART	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 276

Another SI Quality Discourse Thread off to a great start. I thought the 3rd time would be a charm. However, I'm wrong again. How many times do I have to start this thread to have a chance of having a decent on topic conversation? If there is no one at SI who has any interest in managing their portfolios to a scientific certainty, then so be it. It would just confirm my growing suspicions regarding the lack of sophistication of this community and the audience SI seems to cater to. I just want a chance to find out, without first having the thread attacked within minutes of its creation. I know that there are at least a few interested people because they have PM me. However, no serious minded person wants to participate in a thread that is constantly flaming Subject 23297 . This is how speech is controlled and we are ultimately silenced.