Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bullmarket who wrote (29508)	10/15/1998 12:51:00 PM
From: canon ball	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

I agree with that Bull.People need to ask's them self's that same thing why didn't the insiders sell, when it hit $8.00.I know I would have sold in a hart bet.If I new that there wasn't a chance that contract's were not coming,but the company didn't do that.Why" they know what there coming in to.And know that it's just a matter of time,Before contract's are signed.People need to look at this as a good Oman. And get a grip on them self's. Take a look at the whole pie,not just a peice of it.But no matter what you say or how you try to help them they won't lissen to you,there mind's are made up and no room for anyone else's opinion's.JMHO REGARDS CANON BALL

To: bullmarket who wrote (29508)	10/15/1998 2:19:00 PM
From: Ronaldo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

The stock price has little to do, at present, with the fundamentals of the Co. Those investors that get fixated on " give me formal papers right now" might be desillusioned. These emotional rollercoasters we have gone through have only helped some "traders from within" make money at the expense of shareholders with not enough stamina, wanna be traders, finantialy overextended individuals etc. I dislike intensly Larry Bryant's position. He is under the delusion that, at a certain moment, he had a profit of 4 MMU$S, that is BS. I suggest we forget that # 8, it has been harmful, the repesentation of panic buying (of which I have also been part!). I want to put in a good word for entrepeneurs and a so-so one for corporation men. Two close friends of mine (my friendship to both goes back some 17 years) just went into business together. They bought a bodega, a winnery. One of them was in the wine business, sold and now is back with this venture. The other is the #2 executive of a dutch bank in this country (and is only an investor). My friend the banker, has successfuly loaned billions of $ (successfully means got back principal and interest ) but is completely unable to imagine the resolution of the most menial situation and or problems any entrepeneur, in any country, can in a mili-second.. This is not an issue of intelligence or formal education but practical education. I want to tie this in especially for Howard C. who is too fixated on SB-10 (I was too, but refocused). As long as the entrepeneur, in this case Jimmy Chin, tries his best, give him the breathing space to do his thing. Entrepeneurs have a way to get things done. Usually messy in a formal way but efficient in practical terms. There is a point in the developmentg of the Co. where this way of doing things, which got the Co. started get's in the way of it's development. IMHO we are far away from there. Hope it helps, sorry for being so long. #50