Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IBM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (4127)	10/26/1998 10:02:00 AM
From: Rob Bowerman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8218

Hi SB, I'm sorry, but I must be really dense. I just don't get your point. If IBM borrows someone else's money at, say, 5% and then makes loans to its customers at 12% in order to make sure that they can buy IBM's products with a, say, 30% mark-up, what is the downside? The customers are paying the principle AND the interest of the loan AND IBM recovers its manufacturing/development costs AND gets 30% profit while ensuring that the customer gets a streamlined loan process without bringing in a third-party to the transaction. This is exactly the concept behind GE Capital and frankly, EVERY lending institution (Credit Unions, Banks, Savings and Loans, mortgage companies, etc.). This frees up cash that IBM generates each year to be used in other ways, IF IT SO CHOOSES. I think this demonstrates that IBM is a very prudent money-manager in this area. So, what am I missing? --Rob

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (4127)	10/26/1998 2:57:00 PM
From: DavesM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8218

sb Re: "IF employees decide that stock options suck and want cash instead...." Maybe the others can confirm, but I thought IBM has a (cash) profit sharing program for employees. It has been in place for several years now, and goes to a very large percentage if not all employees.