SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Trader who wrote (8295)11/11/1998 8:54:00 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44573
 
Tom,

I like using 25 days because a shorter period gives too many false signals and a longer period gives a signal a bit too late. 25 days seems to filter out much of the day to day zig zags within the move and still gets me in or out safely. It differentiates between a rally dip and rally top.

I may exit for a day or two on a false sell, as I did a few weeks ago, but I'll quickly reposition for the resumption of the move. This lets me get out before any serious decline begins. Using this method, I'll never miss a major top and get caught long or major bottom and miss a good rally like the one we're witnessing currently.

The divergence that I mentioned is not at all related to momentum, but an ongoing on balance calculation of the advance declines over time.

GZ



To: Tom Trader who wrote (8295)11/11/1998 10:50:00 AM
From: Tom Allinder  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 44573
 
To All: To what degree do you consider the weather in trading? What type of information regarding weather would be useful? What is the minimum time frame that weather can effect futures prices? Does anyone use a "weather service" with regard to futures trading. Thanks for any feedback.

Tom