SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (42216)11/25/1998 1:44:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1572172
 
OOOOOOOhhhhhh, AMD ever so slowly breaking through 29...29 1/8...29 3/16. Do I hear 30...31...

Jim



To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (42216)11/25/1998 1:56:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572172
 
Brian,

I agree with Ten. The onboard cache on K6-3 systems will produce a smaller percentage performance gain vs. K6-2, than the onboard cache on CeleronA systems did vs. Celeron.

Scumbria



To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (42216)11/25/1998 2:21:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572172
 
<You make statements that you do not prove i.e. the addition of L2 cache on Mboard to Celeron will give greater performance increase than adding on die L2 cache to K6-3>

Brian, once again we have a failure to communicate. Read my message again. I said, "Adding an on-die L2 cache to Celeron is going to help a lot more than adding an on-die L2 cache to the K6-2." I never said anything about adding an L2 cache to the motherboard of a Celeron system.

<If that is so , why isn't the PII so much faster since it has up to 1M of L3 cache on the Mboard ?>

Uhhh, there is no L3 cache on any motherboard which supports Pentium II. Where did you get that notion?

<If you are going state the reason is half speed L2 cache that is not going to prove your point , you opened the can of worms , you prove your statements not just make them .>

Please, Brian, I'm not stating facts here, just opinions. I back up my opinions with explanations, not proof. You can argue about points in my explanations, as long as you don't misquote me like you just did here.

Tenchusatsu



To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (42216)11/25/1998 3:44:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572172
 
Re: "If that is so , why isn't the PII so much faster since it has up to 1M of L3 cache on the Mboard ?"

Brian you are really on a roll! First you're talking about the (current) high volumes of the K6-3 and the K7, and now the PII has onboard L3!!

EP



To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (42216)11/25/1998 8:55:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1572172
 
Brian - Re: " If that is so , why isn't the PII so much faster since it has up to 1M of L3 cache on the Mboard ? "

Where did you get this ridiculous, erroneous idea?

Paul