Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearded One who wrote (22016)	12/8/1998 4:41:00 AM
From: Charles Hughes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24154

MSFT had their argument that 'this was technically necessary' from the beginning. Now if you have several professionals stand up and say, no here are some other ways, you have removed the necessity part of the equation, which leaves everybody thinking about why MSFT really put the system together in the competition-unfriendly way it did. At least, I think having some other engineers make a case that there were alternatives has little downside in front of this judge, if not a jury. Cheers, Chaz

To: Bearded One who wrote (22016)	12/8/1998 10:59:00 AM
From: Gerald R. Lampton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

I think, however, he could make and win a smaller point, which is that Microsoft has lots of choices about how to arrange their files and programs, and that any arguments that Microsoft might make about having to do something one way or another are probably bogus. They could make that argument, but without some idea of what are the relative costs and benefits of all the various choices, and being able to compare them in a meaningful way, they would probably lose, which is precisely my point. Making such a meaningful comparison, and therefore a valid decision about what is the best technical solution for Microsoft to choose among its many choices, furthermore, is not possible without having meaningful information about all of the costs of the various factors of production (meaning opportunity costs, since those are what determine prices) and relative values to end users of all of the various uses to which the finished products, in each of their various configurations, might be put. To make these comparisons, if they can be made at all, I think an expert witness would need to have to have economic qualifications that Farber doesn't have. And, the impossibility of performing this task may be one very compelling reason why the Court of Appeals will only require that Microsoft present a "plausible" technical justification for its choice among the various technical alternatives, not that it prove it made the best choice, or even a better one.