To: WONG who wrote (2592 ) 1/4/1999 1:04:00 PM From: Tom Respond to of 2951
Hong Kong v. Singapore December 16th WONG writes:Four Reasons to put money in Singapore (At least some of it...) 1) HK$ still pegged to the greenback, interest rate adjustments have to adhere to the moves made by the US. In the past 3 months, Singapore has reduced interest rates by 2%, HK only 3/4%. 2) HK GDP is -5%, whereas Singapore can still maintain +2.3%. 3) HK has a budget deficit of HK$40-50 billion, Singapore has a surplus of S$3.1 billion (more room for increased government spending). 4) Singapore has imposed across the board salary reductions, rent reductions and pension plan premium reductions. Making it very attractive for business to operate there. ----- December 24th FEER editorial:IT'S ALL ABOUT COST Hong Kong's dulled edge Maybe Hong Kong has belatedly woken up to reality. Reports earlier this week were that the government will review civil service wages and consider lay-offs. Yes, this is the same government that earlier, in the midst of the deepening gloom, upped government salaries by about 5%, sending a confusing message to the private sector. It's also the same government that continues to run television ads on retraining the unemployed for jobs as domestic helpers. And the same city that has debated wage cuts for foreign maids. Local maids, lower wages for foreign maids -- neither contributes to growth in the real economy. In other words, this is a city confused about adapting to the financial crisis. So we'll wait to see if the government wage pow-wow actually pans out. More interesting has been the reaction of Hong Kong's rival, Singapore, to the crisis. Singapore has urged companies to cut their total wage bills by 15%. For its part, beginning in January the (Singapore)government will halve employers' contributions to the Central Provident Fund from 20% of employees' monthly pay. As a consequence, even if you work for a company that meets the 15% target, your take-home pay may be barely affected. And for a city long-known for government-led initiatives, the market itself has been quick to pare costs. A business-class hotel room goes for around $130 a night, compared with about $200 in Hong Kong. For 60 cents you can get a bowl of noodles in some Singapore food courts. Indeed, while about $1,200 will fetch a comfortable three-bedroom apartment in a complex with a swimming pool and tennis court near the National University of Singapore, twice the sum in a like locale in Hong Kong gets you a space one-third smaller with no recreational amenities. So is it any wonder that Caltex is moving its global headquarters to Singapore? Instead of allowing prices to adapt down, Hong Kong appears intent on burnishing its high-rent reputation. In fact, there was almost a palpable sense of relief that real-estate speculation had resurfaced on the back of lower interest rates. Hong Kong Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa has said that "we will be moving sideways along the bottom for some time before we get the recovery going." Are we so sure it's not a false bottom?