SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jbe who wrote (20961)12/17/1998 12:40:00 AM
From: one_less  Respond to of 67261
 
<<who would listen to me?>> me



To: jbe who wrote (20961)12/17/1998 1:18:00 AM
From: Nikole Wollerstein  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
"... people here
were amazed and humiliated that Americans should have been taken hostage.
Okay -- take Italians hostage; take Ghanians hostage; take Indonesians hostage. But Americans? ... "
And now after 20 years of embargo, straggling in poverty and with no hope in the future
Iranianes who still have brains think "How stupid it was to take Americans hostages"

The other nation that made Americans "amazed and humiliated "
was Japan.



To: jbe who wrote (20961)12/17/1998 1:25:00 AM
From: pezz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
I have not seen war up close fortunately for me . But I have a very good imagination which tells me that it is indeed hell. Perhaps to be avoided at almost all costs.I believe I understand what you mean by "Top dog" as this has seemed to play out every time we have had one of our little adventures around the world [ except Viet Nam ] I also understand what you were saying about the wishy washy thing.The truth of the matter is that I think that this policy has failed and should be re-thought. I don't know what should be done but clearly this is not working.The embargo is killing innocents Saddam is still there. What has been gained?
I would on the other hand take exception with your assessment that Bush could have made things better by going after Saddam when he had the chance.I have to give Bush credit. I thought he did the best that could have been done. I suspect that there would have been grave repercussions around the world had we continued that war any farther.Too many deaths, The picture of the big bad USA invading a Moslem country would not have sat well with Moslems around the world. << Who would listen to me>> On the other hand. Probably more people than would listen to me.
pez



To: jbe who wrote (20961)12/17/1998 9:33:00 AM
From: mrknowitall  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
jbe - agree with most of what you said until you mentioned that Bush had the international support to get rid of the Iraq problem.

The coalition was not that robust. In fact, had the fighting gone on much longer, we would have had to draw on additional NATO forces and materiel - not something we had the backing to do. The UN had no stomach for taking a Muslim leader out, even Saddam.

Mr. K.