Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pronichev who wrote (6748)	1/5/1999 8:07:00 AM
From: Herb Blair	Respond to of 27311

Guys, We are beating this to death. Neither the bulls or the bears are adding anything new. Positions are not going to change. Let's wait for some news good or bad and spin some more.<EOM>

To: Pronichev who wrote (6748)	1/5/1999 9:34:00 AM
From: Mark Johnson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27311

Pronichev: Dozens of posters have noted Larry/noways lack of common sense. Larry hasn't much to do and enjoys the banter. We've all noticed the nonsensical repetition. Anyone who takes hindsight and credits himself needs a self esteem lift. If the best he can do is put up links to past posts, well... at least it shows an effort. I'm looking for a steady incline of the stock this month and looking forward to some positive announcements!! Good luck to the longs!!!

To: Pronichev who wrote (6748)	1/5/1999 10:45:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Michael, thank you, a reasonable post. Common sense would argue you are correct, if Berg thinks they are close. Which makes me wonder why he did not remove the "milestones" requirement when the financing terms were changed. If VLNC announces they've now got Berg's additional $7.5 million, it will be a positive indicator.

To: Pronichev who wrote (6748)	1/5/1999 6:16:00 PM
From: mooter775	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Better be careful, Pronichev... If you do undertake due diligence and act on it without telling Larry or his pal nowaynow, somehow you've violated his guidelines for acting on insider information. Better more to read, and reread, and reread those S-3s - and short term trade based on those tea leaves. You see, Larry and nowaynow feel that one who states his beliefs based upon some information which he/they either don't have or are too lazy to ferret out is either (1) hyping the stock, or (2) acting on insider information. He/they assume all investors must have the same information and perspective that they do - so how on earth could they come to earlier conclusions. I find Larry's/nowayhow's posts as irrelevant as he/they surely find mine. Seriously, my own due diligence confirms what you have said in your post regarding status of the NI operations.