Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (28502)	1/19/1999 10:40:00 AM
From: John Lacelle	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Les, That post was a riot! Witness: "What do you mean by truthful?" Judge: "This is not a Clinton deposition..." BWAHAHA!!! -John

To: Les H who wrote (28502)	2/2/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: iandiareii	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Les Abortion Providers Win Suit Over Web Site, Posters PORTLAND, Ore. (Reuters) - A federal jury Tuesday ordered anti-abortion activists to pay more than $50 million in damages to abortion clinics and doctors in a landmark case testing the limits of free speech on the Internet. After a three-week trial and more than five days of deliberations, the jury agreed with plaintiffs who argued ''The Nuremberg Files'' Web site and wanted-style posters constituted threats and limited free access to abortion clinics. dailynews.yahoo.com I don't expect that you have any truck with the murderers of the armed anti-abortion movement, so respond or not as you will. I'm really looking for left analysis of the 1st Amendment issues here. My unfiltered (pre-constitutional) reaction is "YIPEE! Screw the accomplices!" but I imagine this righteous delight will be tempered over time. Still, for the time being, I offer a small prayer for the victims of the assassinations, and their families. ian