SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (31088)1/30/1999 4:03:00 PM
From: Bill  Respond to of 67261
 
Just the opposite. I am a conservative and I am not a sexist. I abhor those who employ or compensate on the basis of sex, and those who treat women as tools. I believe Clinton does those things.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (31088)1/30/1999 4:10:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Could this be true?

Message 7573236



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (31088)1/30/1999 5:27:00 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 67261
 
Did you find the McLaughlin site ok? You like it?



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (31088)1/30/1999 7:21:00 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 67261
 
In my case, I stayed home to raise our child, doing occasional free- lance work, while my wife holds an executive position. I have always been supportive of her career, and have not felt my masculinity threatened by her success. Obviously, woman do not only care about sexual behavior, or feminists would be calling for Bill's head, instead of hypocritically supporting him because he supports their position on abortion rights. But whether or not a man is inclined to use women as playthings is not wholly unimportant, is it?



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (31088)1/31/1999 4:24:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 67261
 
Nope. We figured perjury and obstruction on top of the cavalier attitude toward women would make a difference. We were wrong. JLA