To: Zeev Hed who wrote (20806 ) 1/31/1999 8:32:00 AM From: TechHunter Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 25960
Zeev- RMBS vs.Cymer Please explain why RMBS would trade as high as $110 (109 7/8) Based on; 1. $.32 Expected earning for 1999 2. $1.07 expected earnings for 2000 3. 43% sequential growth year to year. Given, with RMBS recent announcement of flat EPS of .08 for next 2/3 quarters have shot them to 75 (and I think will bring them to 60) But my point is, they got the coverage, the exposure which brought them from the 30's to the 100+ per share level in less then 6 months. they are viewed as a monopoly. I don't believe the numbers above justify a $110 per share level, but if they had come out with 40-50% sequential growth this last Q, I believe they would have gone higher. IF Cymer show a small loss or even a breakeven after what is projected for this Q, and the CC is extremely positive, IF words like 40-50% sequential growth are used (which I believe COULD happen) IF Merrill or another MM raises estimates for 2000 to 1.50 from current levels This stock COULD take off like a rocket ship. I don't know about TA or semis too well, but I'd like to think I'm an expert on 'human nature'. Human Nature is the analyst who does not want to go into his Managing Directors office and explain why he missed this one. Human Nature is the reaction to (Hopefully, Someday) when WE get CNBC saying that So and so brokerage firm raises Cymer to Strong Buy based on their Monopoly of next Generation etc. Human Nature is when some bozo calls Intel Cymer etc 'internet' stocks which could happen as irresponsible as these people are. My point is momentum and publicity count as much if not more as TA in this 'wired-world' we live in. JMHO, Craig