SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JBL who wrote (31194)1/31/1999 11:49:00 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
No doubt about it JBL. And did you see that Tom Dashle saying having Monica Lewinsky come before the Senate and testifying, would be beneath the standards of that holly place or something? So let me get this straight... It's okay to engage in the behavior in the Oval office, and dishonor that place. But it's not okay to testify about it in the Senate?? :-)

How pathetically partisan can you get! :-)

A few years from now, when the liberal press stops pounding out their 6.7 second sound bites. The American people will see the shallow Democrats for what they really are. Namely, a bunch of total hypocrites, who whined on and on about Clarence Thomas, Bob Packwood and Richard Nixon. But who now can't find the moral courage to force any standards of right on wrong on one of their own. If DNA evidence came out tomorrow showing Bill Clinton was a rapist. They would find some reason to justify his behavior. It would be Ken Starr's fault that he stressed him out so much. Or how about this famous line...."but everyone in Washington does it". Name me one politician who has a pope like background? They are all a bunch of rapist at some level or another. Marriage is a form of rape. :-)

My question is, how far are they willing to go down the ses-pool in order to save their King and Queen?

Michael



To: JBL who wrote (31194)1/31/1999 12:13:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I think you're a blunder of historic proportions. Why break party lines here? The juicy parts would all get leaked to Drudge, regardless.