Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucky Charm who wrote (25253)	2/5/1999 5:37:00 PM
From: Roger Bodine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Well, Lucky, so what, right? every stock fluctuates for 1,000+ reasons. I am looking forward to some of that upward flux. I think we have all reached the point that you either feel this company is going to make it big time or not. Place your bets. I'm still here. Roger

To: Lucky Charm who wrote (25253)	2/5/1999 5:42:00 PM
From: astheworldturns	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Yet do not be fooled; blonde is only a color. She is sharp and to the point.

To: Lucky Charm who wrote (25253)	2/5/1999 7:02:00 PM
From: ColleenB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

I believe what Colleen has done was use inaccurate figures, thrown them out there and they just don't make sense. She is using an average daily volume (3,907,500) based on a 52 week period of time and trying to fit it into a 5 day average volume. She needs to redo her math and post accurate figures. Nice try there Lucky Charm, but the number I used for the AVERAGE trading volume is accurate. I obtained this number from the bottom of this screen. I am not indicating that the number I used was reflective for a one week trading volume average. It is IMPROPER and MISLEADING for you to sway people to believe that the volume generated in a ONE WEEK increase be used as a norm for the trading patterns of PRWT. The number (I used) as the norm takes into account the volume increase (dumping) we saw during the week of DECEMBER 10th. I could have been more selective and gotten the average for the month, which would have made the numbers look even more bleak, but I was fair in my analysis and presentations. However, in rechecking my numbers I see that I did make an error, possibly mispunched my calculator, what ever my error, it was not intentional. Let me list the numbers that I am using so you can check me further, starting with today's volume and working backwards through the week... 7,768.8M; 7,446.0M; 7,594.4M; 4,871.1M; and 5,742.7M... added together these numbers should yield 33,423M; and divided by 5 should yield 6,684.6M for this week's average. And this number is still 1.711% HIGHER than the norm. or 6,684.6K shares traded above the same normal trading period.