Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bindusagar Reddy who wrote (6108)	2/8/1999 11:34:00 AM
From: hitesh puri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

Bingo. Read Message 7715692 -hitesh

To: Bindusagar Reddy who wrote (6108)	2/8/1999 8:14:00 PM
From: Pat Hughes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21876

< These two ANAL MORONS are living in STONE AGE or they are paid by CSCO to bad mouth LU. AT least everyone knows why LU was weak last week. This should make for a Rally this week, knowing that two IDIOTS who were negative on LU since 1996 are reiterating their IDIOTIC views. Nothing has changed fundamentally in their business. We hope Wall street teaches them a lesson and their firms fire them so they can work for Chambers fulltime. > Nicely worded. It is true and funny! Pat Hughes

To: Bindusagar Reddy who wrote (6108)	2/8/1999 11:37:00 PM
From: Anonymous	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

"These two ANAL MORONS are living in STONE AGE or they are paid by CSCO to bad mouth LU. AT least everyone knows why LU was weak last week. This should make for a Rally this week, knowing that two IDIOTS who were negative on LU since 1996 are reiterating their IDIOTIC views. Nothing has changed fundamentally in their business. We hope Wall street teaches them a lesson and their firms fire them so they can work for Chambers fulltime." Why was LUCENT weak last week? Because of these two analyst's comments? Did they make a public statement over the weekend of 1/30-2/1 to cause the stock to flop? Even the Monday before that (1/25) it closed at 102 1/16. This stock has been up and down since almost the start of 1999. On Wed 1/20 it closed @ 115 1/2 almost making it back up to its closing high on Wed 1/6 @ 117 3/16. What caused it to be up at 117 3/16? Right now this stock is driven by emotion more than anything else. I'm about ready to opt out of it again...however, it is hard for me to stay out since I'm a retired LUCENT employee. I've just got to put my foot down. Anonymous