Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Machaon who wrote (11588)	2/12/1999 4:07:00 PM
From: D PARKER	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Come down out of the etheral to where the people really live. I am here where the rubber meets the road. I now know that Law may not come to my rescue when I am wronged. I cannot rely on the judicial system for protection against those that aim to do me harm. Why is it that I have to pay the bill when someone, not unknown, smashes my car and leaves the scene with impunity? ???????????????????

To: Machaon who wrote (11588)	2/12/1999 5:02:00 PM
From: D PARKER	Respond to of 13994

NOT GUILTY = DO NOT REMOVE Clinton was not convicted of crimes he did commit.

To: Machaon who wrote (11588)	2/12/1999 7:00:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Hey robert, turns out you were right after all. Sherwood has been sending me hate mail for my uncivil tongue. He's been hounding me to apologize to you. You know, when I tell you, you are full of crap and all. In the last one, he told me I "have it coming out both ends." Since he didn't use the REAL dirty word, I guess he isn't a literal hypocrite? Is there such a thing as an inferencial hypocrite? Anyway, that being the case, I was wrong and you were right; at least about the whimpy posters on this thread. I am sorry for doubting you. Hope Sherwood is proud of me for apologizing. You are still full of crap though. Your enemy, brees

To: Machaon who wrote (11588)	2/12/1999 9:46:00 PM
From: Mark	Respond to of 13994

no he didnt do anything-ya thats it its starr ya he did it

To: Machaon who wrote (11588)	2/13/1999 1:14:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13994

Robert - you are still confused. He was ACQUITED. That means the jury didn't want to CONVICT him and subject him to removal from office. It does not mean he was NOT GUILTY. All this means is that the generally-polled populace of our country has been convinced that perjury and obstruction of justice are not crimes that justify removal of a sitting President. Lowly "citizens" like you or me will still be prosecuted and sentenced for such things. As it has been said, "It is good to be king." Mr. K.