SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (34218)2/16/1999 3:08:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<I am not in favor of social engineering legislation of any kind, the worst of which mucks with the tax code.>>

Wrong. You are very in favor of social engineering that provides full access to career ladders for women. Your contention has been that through the natural evolution of traditional roles which are stagnant, women have been short changed in a dynamically changing society and culture. Your ideas in the face of changing what is and protecting the social fix as you want it to be.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (34218)2/17/1999 12:36:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Michelle, did you not read my post on the flat tax? It was directed to you. To recapitulate, most conservatives favor a vat or a flat tax, or a tax with mild progressivity (in one or two steps), and the elimination of all tax preferences. This is called "tax simplification", and it means that most conservatives do not, in fact, favor the use of the tax code for social engineering, certainly not in the long run.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News