Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLFM - Undervalued with great potential -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Capt Ron who wrote (7164)	3/4/1999 11:30:00 AM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9096

There was NO MISINFORMATION...not from ME! I told the story about the Flight/Space division as the first part of the report...that was the positive stuff Then the rest was a NO SHOW... And as far as the guy from GratisTel...didn't even mention him during the entire conference...and NO ONE from the company even had name tags so you really weren't sure who was who... But he (Gratistel wasn't introduced during the entire afternoon and not during the ARC presentation...DIDN'T even mention the DEAL! I thought they already had at least an agreement...That could be mentioned since it's public knowledge that came FROM the company many months ago. chris

To: Capt Ron who wrote (7164)	3/4/1999 12:42:00 PM
From: Telemarker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 9096

Ron, I'm with you for the long term on this one, but think that to characterize expectations of a PR as "dreams" is unwarranted. The company, in its Jan. 19 PR referred to the "variety and import" of the announcements to be made. Certainly, one would not expect important announcements to be confined to a room of people in L.A., for legal reasons if no other. Hence, I'm still here expecting a PR from the company, at least for CYA purposes. At this point, I am concerned about the company's handling of this matter. Three or four PR's about the "by invitation only" symposium? Why bother, if it were to be a private affair? My biggest concern is that the company arranges for adequate working capital on a going-forward basis. This is what I am most interested in hearing about now. As far as Chris goes, I was most amused that some were ready to sell based upon his report from the meeting. While his efforts are appreciated, I for one would have expected a more organized effort from someone who has an investment in the company. Was the panel not introduced? At what time did the proceedings start?, etc., etc. To be sure, Chris isn't accountable to me or anyone else here. My point being that anyone ready to sell based only upon unconfirmed posts in SI are not "investors". Finally, I note the strong buying today that began at the $0.50 level. Perhaps the sky isn't falling after all.