SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike Gold who wrote (10043)3/10/1999 10:13:00 PM
From: Don Rohner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
Sorry to keep asking questions but you happen to be the best source we have. I understand we have a large porphyry but it was my understanding that porphyry are generally low in gold values. So why should be expect an exception in this case?
Thanks
DR



To: Mike Gold who wrote (10043)3/10/1999 10:26:00 PM
From: Don Rohner  Respond to of 25548
 
Hi Mike I just calculated the average gold weight for the missing 6 meters (91-97meters) and missing 27 meters (127-176meters). It comes out at 1.9 grams for this missing 31 meters from the assay values.



To: Mike Gold who wrote (10043)3/10/1999 10:37:00 PM
From: RMF  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 25548
 
Too bad they couldn't have been mor specific.

They only gave numbers on 25 meters out of three holes.
97-108
113-123
155-159
on hole three.

Looks like they have possibilities here, but it will take a heck of a lot more drilling to know what. Seems to be a bit early to speculate on a 'billion' tonnes of mineralization at this point.