Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pallisard who wrote (9147)	3/12/1999 1:05:00 PM
From: Chisy	Respond to of 27311

I never reject listening to pros and cons. We all should know what his agenda is, a shorting, negative subject right here on SI. Sorry, I just don't have time to listen to name calling and continuous bickering.

To: Pallisard who wrote (9147)	3/12/1999 1:17:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 27311

Pallisard, for the record, I have no doubt that Fred is not paid, and Wexler's queries are really not called for, just as the bulls queries about some doubters is not called for either. Right now, the stock is at an interesting junction with a sizeable (11,000) chunk on the bid, which seems to be quite larger than that (since any sales at the bid are not reducing this block). Yet, if this level from which we bounced last week yields under pressure from additional selling, it might be an indication that a PO in March may not be forthcoming. It is quite possible that Mr Murphy is winning another round and some delays in the expected PO have occurred. Typically, such a crucial event would be reflected in a positive bias in the stock, the absence of such a bias, does in my opinion, pose some questions. For whatever it is worth, my general vies of the market is that we are going to go into a "Spring Relapse" sometime in the next two to three weeks, and if VLNC has not managed by then to bounce back well above this level, it might be set for a retest of the recent lows around $5. Of course, if the expected PO does materialize, VLNC could develop its own momentum independent of the general market conditions. Zeev

To: Pallisard who wrote (9147)	3/12/1999 2:09:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27311

<<Mr. Wexler should be asked what his agenda is>> I have no "agenda". I am an individual investor that frequently shorts stocks in overvalued and/or fraudulent companies. I asked "FMK" and "Mark Johnson" those questions because if one follows their past posts, there seem to be a lot of false rumors, hype, and claims of information derived from insiders. I am currently short VLNC and believe the company is nothing more than a stock-promotion fraud.