Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ABER RESOURCES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Fix who wrote (1039)	3/16/1999 3:42:00 PM
From: I_C_Deadpeople	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2006

You have obviously read the JV agreement in it's entirety in order to state from a legal standpoint that ABZ has lost a portion of the property?

To: The Fix who wrote (1039)	3/16/1999 5:49:00 PM
From: .Trev	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2006

It sure looks that way! Let's hope the court sees it as clearly! I find it interesting that twice before the Camsell property JV has had partners diluted for non contribution to exploration costs and in neither case was it contested. That fact alone seems to be ominous indication to me that Aber was trying to pull a fast one and got caught out. The two occasions were Afriore way back in 1995 (I think), and Aber themselves in 1998.