Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Thermo Tech Technologies (TTRIF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5343)	3/26/1999 11:16:00 AM
From: john b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6467

Zeev "....to TTRIF's management or their families, if any." Their you go again Zeev, a valid question or accusations of malapropos and improper business practices as well as family nepotism on the part of the company? Better watch it or they may be coming to take you away. George Orwell's 1984 anyone? Regards

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5343)	3/26/1999 11:21:00 AM
From: Clement	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6467

Zeev, Along the same vein as your question: I'm not sure you were aware of this but I was told that the Richmond building alone (we're not talking about any equiment), the cost per square foot was $125 whereas comparable cost should be closer to between $45-$55... certainly adds up when you have several thousand square feet. Oh -- I forgot to phrase that in the form of a question -- it would be interesting to see if this information was true -- thus my questions to Dr. Cumming are as follows regarding this specific expenditure: 1) Does the cost of $125/sq foot agree with your figures? 2) If so, why did it cost so much when the cost should have only been around $45-$55/sq foot according to a builder? 3) If so, why did you as a director approve of this expenditure especially when you are supposed to be acting on behalf of shareholders? Clement