SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (77320)3/26/1999 2:39:00 PM
From: semi_infinite   Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
About all that vaunted alpha speed advantage...this was copied from the overclocking ng that I follow:

There has been a constant in CPUs: New AMD and Cyrix chips are always rumored to be better than Intel and so far they never are. Intel rules, but the day that AMD ceases to be on Intel's heels is the day Intel prices will go "sky high". The Celeron is the best deal in personal computing history and all of us that got in on OC'ing 50% owe the die hard AMD fans because if they didn't buy 2nd rate AMD CPUs in such huge numbers Intel would never offer the deals we enjoyed this past year. And even though the OC'ing salad days appear to be waning a 433mhz Celeron for about $170 is one hella lotta crushing FPU power for small money. I think the next big thing for us
Celeron fans is the MSI slokets that allow SMP with a jumper. If enough of us go dual then who knows what can happen with games... as far as anyone thinking that a dual 433 Celeron is somehow not a first quality workstation, they just don't know, because it is. There are a lot of 3D MAX and Lightwave users that are still using dual 266 and 300s. A dual 433 Celeron is a big jump. And anyone that believes Alphas are way better than Celerons don't know either. A valid test is difficult but a high end video product called Digital Fusion has such a test and my OC'ed 450 Celeron tests about 10% less
than a 500mhz Alpha. Surprise, Surprise. And guess what? One of the main Digital Fusion programmers uses a dual OC'ed Celeron 450.
Going dual soon: Dual Celerons rule!



To: Scumbria who wrote (77320)3/26/1999 4:34:00 PM
From: John Hull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Wow, looks like I finally can answer the question I asked when that Samsung executive quoted those fantastic growth projections.

[I apologize that I no longer have a reference to site for everyone]

"Do you think anyone actually believes these numbers?"

I guess I found someone.

jh



To: Scumbria who wrote (77320)3/26/1999 8:49:00 PM
From: Gary Ng  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria, Re: Samsung's remarks about Alpha MHz, price and volume for this year

There is one thing I am curious about. You take remarks(or
opinions) from AMD, Samsung, The Register etc. as if they
are always right but at the same time dismiss any remark
from Intel.

What is the basis for this ? Why do you think Intel is not
believable while the others are ?

Gary