SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (5506)4/24/1999 7:02:00 PM
From: Bobby Yellin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81794
 
You lost total credibility when you said that gold didn't perform well in deflation..
You were hysterically funny when you wrote that comment about year2k
and input cards..too bad you didn't mean to be hysterically funny..
I am hoping that some peopleexpress negative views about gold being manipulated but back them up with convincing arguments..
This way Bill will better prepared ..
Bobby
ps I think it more about moral outrage than money



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (5506)4/24/1999 7:15:00 PM
From: Ahda  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81794
 
Ron Bill believes in what he is doing and my head is spinning, I had my grandson tuesday yesterday and damn if i am not getting another cold so i can hardly think .
read this before you call gold dead.

To: Bexar (1835 )
From: ahhaha
Saturday, Apr 24 1999 3:10PM ET
Reply # of 1836

Gold went so low because the FED practiced money supply targeting between 1988
and 1993. They gave that up because it wasn't generating instant prosperity. People had
to work to add value.

From 1980 to 1988 gold was depressed from 50 years of debasement which
culminated in extraordinarily high real cost for loanable funds. After 1980 the FED on
balance stayed out and so nominally erred on the side of restraint. When the market
wanted to drop more quickly to reflect the deflationary forces in place, the FED
wouldn't let it. This was overt erring on the side of restraint.

After the '87 crash the FED decided excesses in either direction were wrong. They
hadn't fully learned what the lesson of 1980 taught. The real lesson is not to err on this
side or that, it is not to interfere with the market's determination of the rate of interest.
For complex reasons not fully understood by anyone, the FED decided to try money
supply targeting with minimal interest rate manipulation. They could do this because the
system was still deflating and there was a paucity of extra demand for loanable funds. It
was a benign environment to try money targeting.

In such an environment there is no debasement so gold's 50 years of inflation driven
price premium evaporated. There were other factors that took away the fear premium
like the end of the Cold War and there were economic factors like tax cuts, budget
discipline, revival of capitalism, reduction of the growth in the welfare state, that took the
pressure off expectations for future inflation. Maybe most important was the effect of
socialism in foreign countries which kept foreign labor cheap and so constrained the will
to inflate of American labor.

This is now being destroyed very slowly because the FED has gone back to interest rate
targeting. They think they know how to fix rates so that no problems will arise. It is that
belief that is the root of their failure. That has been the history of monetary authority.
They can never see the damage being done until way after the fact.

Right now they are holding down the federal funds rate from rising. Why are they doing
this? The demand for loanable funds is starting to rise steeply and the money supply is
on a long term rapid growth trend from previous similar actions. The market has raised
treasury rates which are beyond FED control to reflect the market's recognition that
when demand exceeds supply, rates must rise to slow down the demand. You can
make a lot of arguments about Japanese repatriation selling and bottoming of
commodity prices, but the real issue is demand and supply of funds disbalance due to
concern about the potential of future inflation.

Gold is now fairly well-correlated with T-bond yields with the yields leading by several
months. Gold is an emotional commodity. They'll buy it when they see trouble. Major
markets turn slowly. When you buy the bottom you have to buy and hold. Otherwise, if
you want to trade, you have to wait until the honchos through their buying make price
move substantially. They won't say anything while they're buying, but once they're long
and prices are up, they will be shooting their mouths off. They aren't trying to con you or
dump on you, they are doing it because they're proud of their great skill and ability. The
problem with that is that they don't have any because all of what I've said above
completely escapes them. The above is the only reason gold will rise. All other reasons
including the coming Chinese-Japanese War are just fluff. Gold couldn't rise much
without debasement.