Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (18835)	4/29/1999 8:02:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Henry, compromise may bring short term peace, but it almost always brings mediocrity. I also feel that this peace will be short lived, last only until the coffers are recharged, shareholders diluted, and continued metal recovery failures. Then the war begins anew, of course at lower share prices.

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (18835)	4/29/1999 8:34:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Henry: Fred is gone and no longer able to defend his position. Sometimes even reasonable people with the best of intentions can draw the wrong conclusion. I think this was the case with Fred. He personally believed in J/L and thought it was the best thing for the shareholders. I don't believe he had a financial interest in J/L except to the extent that if successful, share prices would be increased and he owned a lot of shares. I also know that in general, anything JJ promoted, Fred was against. They didn't ever really see eye to eye on much. I don't think Fred much cared for Ledoux (which in hindsight doesn't look like such a bad call). I can't speak to Fr. Gregory's motivations. I doubt they are "evil." After all, he is probably not qualified to run a junior mining co. as neither you or I would be. He may be misguided, he may be misinformed. He's probably never waged a proxy fight before. There's always AT LEAST two sides to every story (depending on how many lawyers are involved <g>). Perhaps it is best to have both viewpoints on the Board. Who can say for certain at the present? Never a dull moment with this company. JLA

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (18835)	4/29/1999 10:00:00 PM
From: sh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

And what lies are these Mr. Nonsense? You know very well that people on here were vilifying Fred Arkoosh for allegedly refusing to compromise at the AGM. You are an odd character indeed. I most assuredly believe the Johnson method may be viable. However, I have expressed my dissatisfaction with the prior arrangement with J/L, probably before you. While you may have a high opinion of yourself and expect everyone else to, I'd like to know where you come up with the conclusion that Fred Arkoosh "conceived [the] proposal to hand of a major portion of the company over to J/L without any verification of their process." Wasn't it you who claimed to never have any time to talk to him while he was alive (although you certainly have enough free time to be on this thread just about everyday). Obviously, you are someone who has had an extreme dislike of Fred Arkoosh and it has driven you to spread lies about his role in the company. Fortunately, characters like yourself are unlikely to have any effect on the current move at reconciliation. I continue to believe FL is rich with PMs and hope the reconciled group can finally move forward in proving and developing the property.