Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Burt Masnick who wrote (81694)	5/26/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Respond to of 186894

Burt - RE: "Who is the Cowens analsyt?" I believe it is Drew Peck.

To: Burt Masnick who wrote (81694)	5/26/1999 5:26:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Burt, thread, has this Register article on Merced been posted here yet? Article is pretty straightforward, has pictures (cartridge doesn't seem that big). Quotes Steve Smith, Intel VP and GM saying samples mid-1999. theregister.co.uk Tony

To: Burt Masnick who wrote (81694)	5/26/1999 5:34:00 PM
From: Jules B. Garfunkel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Hi Burt, The analyst for Cowen is Drew Peck. As we know, Drew has looked for anything negative to write on Intel, or anything positive on AMD, for over five years now. I think he does this to justify the stance he took more than five years ago. At that time he had one good call on weakness in the semiconductor industry, and continues to milk that call for all its worth. Burt, despite reading your post on Cowen's report at least three times, I don't understand what it is saying. Although, I often find myself in disagreement with Drew, I guess this report looses something in the translation. (i.e. everything)(g). What is he talking about? As per John's suggestion, I called Intel's Investor Relations Department today. They confirmed to me that nothing has changed at Intel since their last quarterly guidance report of flat to slightly down earnings for Q2. Recent ASP price reductions were previously planned and nothing has changed. As to why the decline in Intel's price in recent days...she had no idea. Although, she did say that there was a false rumor that the terms of the Level One merger agreement might change, but this, she said, was not true. BTW John, the reason for the mix up in my not getting faxes from Intel, was that my area code had changed six months ago and they were still using my old area code. I herein apologize to the Intel's IR department, but I still feel, they were much better off when you were there. Regards, Jules