SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Crystallex (KRY)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10836 49 0 KRY
Emcee:  John A. Sebonia Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10036 Hello charred; Let me whisper this to ya??...............PDG aint gonna mine Ctanoose-8/11/1999
10035 Well Mr. Syncrude, I see you are dodging my points. You never answer the hard ocharred-8/11/1999
10034 charred, Since you are not interested, then why are you spending so much time Syncrude-8/11/1999
10033 Well I have research it. I found out that management has very generous packagescharred-8/10/1999
10032 charred, I think I know who owns Stay Management, and I guess anyone who claimSyncrude-8/10/1999
10031 Do you see a conflict of interest here?charred-8/10/1999
10030 Hello charred; YES!! I do know who owns Stay, and guess what, so DO the other tanoose-8/10/1999
10029 Hello Syncrude, can you tell me who owns Stay Management.charred-8/10/1999
10028 Hello Frank, question, who owns Stay Management?charred-8/10/1999
10027 Thanks Frank, This should help put some perspective on the Las Cristinas saga Syncrude-8/10/1999
10026 Hello Syncrude; NEWSRELEASE?? Crystallex provides additional information on Ltanoose-8/10/1999
10025 charred, The more you post the more evident it becomes that you have no intereSyncrude-8/8/1999
10024 So what, the last ruling says they donït have the property. Which part doncharred-8/8/1999
10023 charred, I doubt you can ever understand and get up-to-speed if you ignore ALLSyncrude-8/8/1999
10022 KRY doesnït have a good chance of winning LC. The court decision showed thcharred-8/8/1999
10021 charred, I think Crystallex has a favorable risk/reward profile with respect tSyncrude-8/8/1999
10020 ...At the moment, Placer Dome (via Minca) only has contracts-of-work, the expircharred-8/8/1999
10019 charred, If you had been following this saga closely, you would known the answSyncrude-8/8/1999
10018 Syncrude, if you are right, Why canït KRY mine the property? The fact is charred-8/7/1999
10017 charred, As usual, when confronted with factual posts, you run towards fantasySyncrude-8/7/1999
10016 That is no answer. The fact is management has noted it may be a long battle. Lacharred-8/7/1999
10015 The simple fact is that Placer is allowed to mine the property. The last rulingcharred-8/7/1999
10014 Carl... Motive,, is EVERYTHING!! ESPECIALLY suspicious when one hides behind Iknownothing2-8/7/1999
10013 Do not impersonate me in the course of your promotions. tia. eom. marcos-8/6/1999
10012 Carl, You suggested that Crystallex was a DEAD HORSE. I think that it is fairSyncrude-8/6/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):