SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
DianaCorp (DNA)-Hype is over- Respect begun- Many shorts
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
201 2 0 DNAK
Emcee:  Scott Rafe Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
101 Who knows. I would love to know the whole story behind this thing. I expect tDylan Yolles-2/18/1997
100 No, he don't dare to sell it at 100. In that case, a lot of law suits wouldHaolin Ni-2/18/1997
99 Don't you think it was odd that Fischer, and Runge sold their stock at $10-george johnson-2/18/1997
98 Thanks for the info. I thought shorts were not covered. BTW, It seems like feAngelM-2/17/1997
97 Hi, AngelM. It is not as you thought there are a lot of shorts in DNA now. I trHaolin Ni-2/16/1997
96 I guess it was the same for the former board member as well. (big sale in Nov) AngelM-2/16/1997
95 News correction regarding the sale of stock......it was by the FORMER presidentPdolphin-2/14/1997
94 I think, you are correct George I have been watching this stock more or less pStefan Habermayer-2/14/1997
93 Sure. Companies are valued on their earnings (or expected earnings) and on theiGeorge-2/13/1997
92 George, can you elaborate more why do you think "it has very little valuAngelM-2/13/1997
91 It has very little value as compared to its market value. Probably less than $5George-2/13/1997
90 More trouble??-Press release Diana Corp president cuts stake to 11.3 pct WASHINEric Seltzer-2/12/1997
89 Nope it <i>has</i> value? -or- Nope it is worth 5 bucks? I don'Urlman-2/12/1997
88 Nope.George-2/11/1997
87 I thought it was "company policy" not to comment on the stock's tUrlman-2/10/1997
86 So much for the good news out today about three switches that were sold today. george johnson-2/10/1997
85 Eric, I was short 500 shares and have covered the entire position. The downsideMr. Short-2/8/1997
84 Anyone have any ideas why DNA is STILL dropping and where the bottom is? What Eric Seltzer-2/7/1997
83 mike - sorry for answering late but I am travelling. I know about it because I AngelM-2/6/1997
82 Where do you see the bottom for this one. The other businesses should have a fiMr. Short-2/5/1997
81 lots if news - wheres the contract news?mike canavan-2/4/1997
80 mike- what are you hearing on dna?don thomas-1/31/1997
79 angel - leave specifics on the show and how you know sattel will be there. whomike canavan-1/30/1997
78 short - dna has never followed the market, if anything there is an inverse relmike canavan-1/30/1997
77 Hi All I am following this thread since Dec and I am keen to understand if DNAngelM-1/30/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):