SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Pluvia vs. Westergaard
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1267 13 0
Emcee:  JEFF CHAPMAN Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1017 Ken, Thank you, it would seem that for all of Pluvia's detractors, the endNoneyet-9/3/1997
1016 Tom, I will respond later. Unfortunately some of us still have to work for a Cisco-9/3/1997
1015 Ken, I believe that the reason Mr. Westergaard took his ball and went home wasCisco-9/3/1997
1014 Good one Thomas; I was catching up on posts and went back to the several posts Ken Merwin-9/3/1997
1013 Steve, I just finished reading this week's Westergaard Online's "Cisco-9/3/1997
1012 <<Say, I guess Louis doesn't like Pluvia. I don't know of anyone Daniel-9/3/1997
1011 Cisco, Your quotations from Black's Law Dictionary have helped keep us tettmclyne-9/3/1997
1010 Mitch, ( Off Topic ) Montreal. Isn't New Orleans for sinners ? By the waNoneyet-9/3/1997
1009 Wendall, To all who might have missed Pluvia's post to wendall !! This oneNoneyet-9/3/1997
1008 Off-topic: Religion This topic of this thread is the basis for most of the reltmclyne-9/3/1997
1007 Well, Jeffrey, Actually, JW might be thinking hard about the Blair fine. That mtmclyne-9/3/1997
1006 Say, I guess Louis doesn't like Pluvia. I don't know of anyone who liketmclyne-9/3/1997
1005 Tom, I certainly hope that JW still reads this board, and I certainly hope he hJeffrey S. Mitchell-9/3/1997
1004 JW has found THE SMOKING GUN!!! He sent me and e-mail:<<snip>> Subtmclyne-9/3/1997
1003 Hey buddy, you mess with Jeff's stock and I'll get Westergaard on your Jeffrey S. Mitchell-9/3/1997
1002 <<<Bottom line, it looks like Stevie tried to do the holders of PremiePluvia-9/3/1997
1001 Damn-it...I knodded off while lurking for a sneak attack!....ah good night!Scrapps-9/3/1997
1000 Hey, I couldn't have done it without the help of Louis' few hundred posJeffrey S. Mitchell-9/3/1997
999 Using an obviously transparent line of drivel to steal post #1000 away from me Bill Ulrich-9/3/1997
998 1000 posts and still no smoking gun. (end) - Jeff Jeffrey S. Mitchell-9/3/1997
997 Mark, just curious, are SI's lawyers involved? Just trying to get a sense oJeffrey S. Mitchell-9/3/1997
996 SI has not made an official comment but they are aware of what is going on. MaMark Johnson-9/3/1997
995 Hope no one minds if I intrude here with an ON-topic post. From Letters to the Wendell Holmes-9/3/1997
994 Bill wrote: <i>Then I'll make an untruthful post on the PLSIA threadJeffrey S. Mitchell-9/3/1997
993 Thomas... sorry to butt in, but I saw your post about Santa. And since you werMitch Blevins-9/3/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):