SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Biotime-Nasdaq's best kept secret?
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1432 16 0 BTIM
Emcee:  William Nguyen Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1032 <i> The thing that gets me about this co., and one of the reasons I have Stephen How-6/21/1998
1031 The thing that gets me about this co., and one of the reasons I have an open miLazlo Pierce-6/21/1998
1030 Mirror works! Please bookmark "new" location: btim.dyn.ml.org Now Stephen How-6/21/1998
1029 call me foolish, but I bought a little more at 6-3/8 on wednesday. I'm, stTomOrt-6/20/1998
1028 New transparent "mirror" for my Biotime website. I'm now mirroriStephen How-6/20/1998
1027 23% of shares short makes this a very interesting play. If the company survivesHal-6/19/1998
1026 Daily Trouble: fnews.yahoo.comTodd D. Wiener-6/19/1998
1025 Monday June 15, 9:53 am Eastern Time Company Press Release BioTime's PentaLTomOrt-6/15/1998
1024 mesaone, I don't think submitting the pre-clinical rabbit XO reperfusionStephen How-6/15/1998
1023 Stephen, I don't think it is fair of you to speculate that margin calls hamesaone-6/14/1998
1022 Rule 144 exception for affiliates selling unrestricted securities. I was surprStephen How-6/14/1998
1021 Also sounds like a way that Biotime could sell their products for other purposeJim Roof-6/14/1998
1020 "FDA to Ease Rules on 'Off-Label' Uses of Drugs, Devices." WStephen How-6/13/1998
1019 <i>I agree that he has thought out his position (though he still puts forStephen How-6/12/1998
1018 <<Look, if you don't want to do some thinking, skip his posts; but pJim Roof-6/12/1998
1017 <i><<I am not being mean.>></i> Nahhhh, of course notAnaxagoras-6/12/1998
1016 Steve, Your posts are becoming more and more disjointed. Please try to write Jim Roof-6/12/1998
1015 When did Crossen provide his last BTIM update? post.messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahStephen How-6/12/1998
1014 Crossen, Asensio both wrong on hetastarch dosage limitations: btim.dyn.ml.org Stephen How-6/12/1998
1013 <i>Just what is your position on BTIM today? Rather than post links to yoStephen How-6/11/1998
1012 Just what is your position on BTIM today? Rather than post links to your page Jim Roof-6/11/1998
1011 More on the AJRCCM article: btim.dyn.ml.org Hopefully, this makes my positionStephen How-6/11/1998
1010 <<If BTIM is what we think it is>> As I explained to you since theBill Wexler-6/10/1998
1009 If BTIM is what we think it is, and what the data has supported, it will not beJim Roof-6/10/1998
1008 Me too. Actually, I have thought all along that BTIM was in a corrective countJim Roof-6/10/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News