SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2013 83 0 CNXT
Emcee:  jas244 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1038 Could you explain more about what this means? I don't get it. Net income David W. Taylor-5/10/2000
1037 David, the net income for the quarter is indeed negative, but it was because thRoger L. Chuchen-5/10/2000
1036 Energy is *not* structural??? Are you on drugs? The cost of energy affects evDavid W. Taylor-5/10/2000
1035 << David - What stock are you discussing? CNXT did indeed make 21cents laDavid W. Taylor-5/10/2000
1034 <b>As far as I can see CNXT *lost* 64 cents per share last quarter and haw molloy-5/10/2000
1033 >> Are you on the correct thread? CNXT made $0.21 last quarter >> David W. Taylor-5/9/2000
1032 Why the money supply? What's interesting about it? There isn't anytMeDroogies-5/9/2000
1031 Really? Everyone is worried when the market wallows like it is right now. LMeDroogies-5/9/2000
1030 Yes it is a crowing bear. CNXT lost a few pieces of business, but is structuMeDroogies-5/9/2000
1029 Energy is not structural, it is usually excluded from the "core" nuMeDroogies-5/9/2000
1028 This site has a tremendous amount of financial data. I believe the money supplyCarolyn-5/9/2000
1027 <I>Would you call real increases in the costs of energy, food, housing angpowell-5/9/2000
1026 <I>This is someone looking realistically at CNXT's loss in that last gpowell-5/9/2000
1025 >> As for the Bear market, we've been in a "bear" market abDavid W. Taylor-5/9/2000
1024 This is not a crowing bear. This is someone looking realistically at CNXT'David W. Taylor-5/9/2000
1023 Would you call real increases in the costs of energy, food, housing and wages sDavid W. Taylor-5/9/2000
1022 Hardly facile. At 12, AAPL was trading at an impossible PE (so was ASPT at 6MeDroogies-5/9/2000
1021 History, over the last 3 years, would say you are wrong about 1. Inflation MeDroogies-5/9/2000
1020 2. Unemployment is at a historic low but inflation is real and rising fast. Yegpowell-5/9/2000
1019 To compare CNXT with AAPL at 12 is facile at best. CNXT is still at least doubDavid W. Taylor-5/9/2000
1018 1. This is not a dip to do with tax-selling. 2. Unemployment is at a historic lDavid W. Taylor-5/9/2000
1017 David, I know you've been victimized on this thread before, but your condMeDroogies-5/9/2000
1016 It's only likened to catching a falling knife if that is indeed what you MeDroogies-5/9/2000
1015 No, you don't understand. The universal wisdom is to buy the dip. Often liDavid W. Taylor-5/9/2000
1014 <I>Have any of you taken advantage of this dip?</I> If it's onmts362-5/9/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News