SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10793<i>I agree re the "no evil conspiracy" comment, but I do think ttejek-6/25/2002
10792<i>"...in January 2001, the wholesale price of a one-year forward contejek-6/25/2002
10791There is a big difference in the chart pattern between WCOM and FONR...FONR was el paradisio-6/25/2002
10790<b>STAY AWAY FROM WCOM! BK IS NEXT!!!Softechie-6/25/2002
10789WCOM meets my investment criteria at .84 cents. I like hammered stocks selling aBlueCheap-6/25/2002
10788<its hard to argue reasonably to people who seem to be in denile> no one cel paradisio-6/25/2002
10787Don't you see that SPX is trading below 1000 and is spelling more weakness ael paradisio-6/25/2002
10786<i>PRICE TARGET CHANGES: Kaufman Brothers Tuesday June 25, 12:32 pm EasterOeconomicus-6/25/2002
10785Thomas: <i>...if WCOM knows that its Q2 numbers will be good....the betteJohn Curtis-6/25/2002
10784WCOM pockets assets of about 346 mm DJ WorldCom/Star Communications -2: Deal WJOHN A.-6/25/2002
10783RE<i>The better off they believe they are, the more that they play hardbalpaul t-6/25/2002
10782Tom, management was given a few chances at the shareholder meeting to warn. TheyRichard Mazzarella-6/25/2002
10781<i>I think you missed my point. The big guys are buying Worldcom bonds andThomas Walker-6/25/2002
10780Richard: <...SSB covering their ass theory> Incredible how one person caFNS-6/25/2002
10779John, good find, thanks. It supports my SSB covering their ass theory. Get enougRichard Mazzarella-6/25/2002
10778RD, <<Maybe the bond buyers, but not the bankers.>> The bond buyers Richard Mazzarella-6/25/2002
10777Also from your link: <i>Mr Grubman's downgrade related in part to a &qOeconomicus-6/25/2002
10776Maybe the bond buyers, but not the bankers. Updating an old proverb, if you owe Oeconomicus-6/25/2002
10775research team slaps Grubman with after note, sit down, shut up. The note also caJOHN A.-6/25/2002
10774Bank want to take over and force the shareholder out. IMHO. The company is very hui zhou-6/25/2002
10773I bought a lot of Citibank shares along time ago when it was $5. I was hoping tYani Strei-6/24/2002
10772Thomas, <<I also agree that WCOM would never draw down the bank line and bRichard Mazzarella-6/24/2002
10771Shoe, I too read that Reuters article. "One analyst, who asked not to be oexwa-6/24/2002
10770It looks like WCOM will be in rough water until Q2 numbers come out. They must Thomas Walker-6/24/2002
10769<i>It’s the market that’s buying the bond paper and shorting the common. SOeconomicus-6/24/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News