SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Cable Car Beverage (DRNK)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
284 2 0
Emcee:  Andrew Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
109 I haven't heard any such rumors, but one would think such a thing would notKhris Vogel-6/3/1997
108 If you don't mind me asking, what is the source of the rumors that DRNK wasAnthony L. Califano-6/2/1997
107 There are some rumors circulating that Coke/Pepsi is looking at several small dHoward Schellenberg-6/2/1997
106 Steve, Thanks for your thoughts. They do help. I understand the theory now tMKEL-5/23/1997
105 Oops! Now where is that delete button? I can erase my message but can't deDana Merrill-5/23/1997
104 Perhaps I should explain more. My current theory on exit points is as follows:Steve Patterson-5/23/1997
103 steve, I decided to get out of the "chicken" mode and try a little vMKEL-5/23/1997
102 Looks like DRNK is holding its high around 3 3/8. I'm hanging on to mine fSteve Patterson-5/22/1997
101 haven't seen the "case" style packaging as of yet.... BTW...Key Joseph C Cracraft-5/19/1997
100 Tangible Net Assets are defined as equity (assets less liabilities) less goodwiAnthony L. Califano-5/18/1997
99 what about the "Alternative #2"?.....it mentions a $3.00 share price Joseph C Cracraft-5/18/1997
98 Based on the Nasdaq requirements noted in message #96, DRNK flunks the Net TangAnthony L. Califano-5/18/1997
97 hmmmm it seems that that if some one sell..another must buy..and vice versa...INVESTOR-5/18/1997
96 Here are current and proposed NASDAQ listing standards. nasdaq.comhoopsville-5/17/1997
95 Sounds good to me. I think todays down-tick was market reaction and hopefully MKEL-5/16/1997
94 Don't know about rules for being listed on NASDAQ. What about when it hiAnthony L. Califano-5/16/1997
93 I have no idea. The stock has to be above a certain number for 5 or more conseMKEL-5/16/1997
92 no news, I bought this originaly because it was picked by Strategic Investor onchristopher-5/16/1997
91 what's the rule for getting listed on the big board?christopher-5/16/1997
90 This was filed on the 15th. Might have had some effect. CABMKEL-5/16/1997
89 Purely speculation... Has DRNK has been above 3 for enough days to get listed oMKEL-5/15/1997
88 I didn't even get steak !! Lets hope it's just the start of a long andMKEL-5/15/1997
87 Could be rumors of buyout from a major player rising again, IMHO. What else cohoopsville-5/15/1997
86 YIPEE!!! I didn't sell. Too chicken finally wins. (How long will it lastJake's mom-5/15/1997
85 good day today...has anyone heard anything?christopher-5/15/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):