| Reply | Message Preview | From | Recs | Posted |
| 109857 |
Chic, We don't want to have another poster disappearing into the ether. P | Gopher Broke | - | 5/9/2000 |
| 109856 |
ted an thread: tripling was my bad, not SI When I went to preview and then to | boris_a | - | 5/9/2000 |
| 109855 |
I did not know there is a penalty of more than 30 days. | Kenith Lee | - | 5/9/2000 |
| 109854 |
Petz, <But Katmai was 0.25u process because CuMine was the first 0.18 from I | Tenchusatsu | - | 5/9/2000 |
| 109853 |
Tench, re:<By the way, Katmai was Pentium III, not II.> But Katmai was 0. | Petz | - | 5/9/2000 |
| 109852 |
Better Athlon Linux performance! (CPU) Posted By johan Monday, May 8, 2000 - 3 | milo_morai | - | 5/9/2000 |
| 109851 |
<i> There is some concern among some AMD longs on Clearstation re AMD ins | tejek | - | 5/9/2000 |
| 109850 |
Re: "Those are 731 MHz .25 micron 21264s... much faster CPUs showin | THE WATSONYOUTH | - | 5/9/2000 |
| 109849 |
<i>However, Ultrasparc III low end systems will start to appear late this | tejek | - | 5/9/2000 |
| 109848 |
<i>Where does all this speculation about Willy clocking substantially fas | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109847 |
Re: <i>Dream on there chic ... </i> Rob, I'm not that familia | chic_hearne | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109846 |
A sound bite from H&Q Conf biz.yahoo.com Sounds like cool heads are pushi | xun | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109845 |
< With no performance competition, IBM's servers will be destroying anyt | Rob Young | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109844 |
Al, <i>Are you are suggesting that Intel is showing restraint wrt AMD un | Joe NYC | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109843 |
Jim, > <i>Remember how much trouble Cyrix and NSM had with the future | Goutam | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109842 |
Re:"as soon as Intel gets its home 'N business delivery service for li | ajbrenner | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109841 |
Jozef re <<Where is this suspension talk coming from? Is there anything s | Mani1 | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109840 |
Re: I think you'll see us stretch at least one notch above 1GHz, ...Does an | Dan3 | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109839 |
Jim, <i>I guess he got the 45 day suspension from SI. 30 days has come | Joe NYC | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109838 |
Re <<AMD should install some of this new equipment ASAP! >> LOL, t | Mani1 | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109837 |
Re: <i>So are you suggesting we should load up on IBM shares?</i> | chic_hearne | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109836 |
Re: <i>Sorry, but I think you are ill informed. The IBM R6000 UNIX server | chic_hearne | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109835 |
Re: "From all I've read and heard, I can't stress enough how much | THE WATSONYOUTH | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109834 |
chic: So are you suggesting we should load up on IBM shares? :-) Sam | Y. Samuel Arai | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109833 |
Re: <i>IBM's a big company (duh), and has a lot of processor lines. A | chic_hearne | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109832 |
Hi Al, Gateway doesn't show it on their on-line page, but they will substi | Dan3 | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109831 |
Many <Boy I miss Paul Engel at time like this.> The funny part is, by ma | 5dave22 | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109830 |
Enzyme, <so corrected it's a .18 katami pII (III? 600MHz?) core with 128 | Tenchusatsu | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109829 |
None of s/370 series/1 or AS/400 was a microprocessor, though. And 4300's | Daniel Schuh | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109828 |
Chic, IBM's a big company (duh), and has a lot of processor lines. An SMP | Daniel Schuh | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109827 |
AMD should install some of this new equipment ASAP! Message 13632462 | Y. Samuel Arai | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109826 |
Re: <i>I got a brother who works at Sequent, which IBM bought, presumably | chic_hearne | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109825 |
Funny thing, Chic. I got a brother who works at Sequent, which IBM bought, pre | Daniel Schuh | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109824 |
<What area of AMD's business do you think can be attacked by Intel in th | Alighieri | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109823 |
interesting post from TMF: What has to be the most interesting bit of news for | enzyme | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109822 |
Itanium question I believe Itanium is scheduled to debut at 18mu using Al? Is | chic_hearne | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109821 |
<i>No one will be able to compete on the high end with IBM by next year u | Gopher Broke | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109820 |
Mani, RE:"Boy I miss Paul Engel at time like this." I guess he got t | Jim McMannis | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109819 |
re: Well, you have it right if you were referring to "current thinking.&qu | enzyme | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109818 |
Ted, <i>Forgetting benchmarks for the moment, does the lower MHz launch | Joe NYC | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109817 |
Chic, You could also ask why IBM produced the original PC using an Intel chip | Gopher Broke | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109816 |
Re: <i>I think when it is all said and done, Merced will be the most expe | chic_hearne | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109815 |
Good article on future technology issues. It will be interesting to see what fo | THE WATSONYOUTH | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109814 |
RE:"IMHO, I think IA64 will end up in the same boat as the Ultra Sparc III | Jim McMannis | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109813 |
<i>But isn't Athlon close to maxing out at 1.5 GHz while Willamette h | Gopher Broke | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109812 |
Chic I think when it is all said and done, Merced will be the most expensive mi | Mani1 | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109811 |
RE:"If I am remember correctly, sampling of first silicon was at the end o | Jim McMannis | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109810 |
Re: <i>Re: Questions on Itanium</i> Gopher, I'm not sure if I | chic_hearne | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109809 |
Ted re <<But isn't Athlon close to maxing out at 1.5 GHz while Willam | Mani1 | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109808 |
Very good interview with Sudeep Balain from Chase H & Q. He talks about hi | chic_hearne | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109807 |
Chic, Re: Questions on Itanium SGI made a similar mistake, hoping to drop the | Gopher Broke | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109806 |
Enzyme, <So is the current thinking that Timna will be a .18 katami pII core | Tenchusatsu | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109805 |
<i>Intel said Willamette should be introduced at 1.3 GHz & 1.4 GHz in | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109804 |
<i>Willy is a new core. It's being rushed. Something tells me it won& | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109803 |
<i>If you recall, PII was introduced at 233 MHz and Pentium MMX was limit | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109802 |
RE:"I noticed that. I wonder what the angle will be once Willy is released | Jim McMannis | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109801 |
Jim, <i>Then for some strange reason the horizon of benchmarks changed. | Joe NYC | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109800 |
Ted re <<maybe that's how AMD's business penetration will start, | Mani1 | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109799 |
Joe, RE:"If you recall, PII was introduced at 233 MHz and Pentium MMX was | Jim McMannis | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109798 |
<i>So is the current thinking that Timna will be a .18 katami pII core wi | Joe NYC | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109797 |
RE:"You've got to know that the Willamette launch will be flawless.&qu | Jim McMannis | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109796 |
RE:"I think it uses the Celeron I core (Mendocino) but I can't imagine | Jim McMannis | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109795 |
So is the current thinking that Timna will be a .18 katami pII core with 128 L1 | enzyme | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109794 |
Ted <i>Do the lower speeds that Intel is introducing...aside from fillin | Joe NYC | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109793 |
RE:""I think you'll see us stretch at least one notch above 1GHz, | Jim McMannis | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109792 |
Petz, <i>the "return to Katmai" news from Intel is a blockbush | Joe NYC | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109791 |
so no SSE for Timna eh Paul | Paul Ma | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109790 |
Al, <i>Chipzilla's litigious nature will again be on public display | Joe NYC | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109789 |
cirruslver and thread <i>Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) officials have confirmed t | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109788 |
Jim, just saw your post about Timna:<Wasn't the Timna designed on .25u, | Petz | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109787 |
Chic, <i>Speaking of lies, has anyone seen the new Oracle commercials? T | Joe NYC | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109786 |
kash, I think I figured out the reason for the "restarting Katmai" ru | Petz | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109785 |
Intel plans aggressive 'Willamette' intro "Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) o | Cirruslvr | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109784 |
<i> Its nice to know that we like similar stocks. You must be a | TimF | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109783 |
Daniel, <i>Via (partialy) bailing Intel out of its Rambus woes while bei | Joe NYC | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109782 |
<i>I don't think it's a jinxing matter. I think that a)they reinf | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109781 |
<First, welcome to the thread!> Thank you. Glad to be here. <...do | Alighieri | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109780 |
<i>Tejek, both of those stocks are on my watchlist at Clearstation, both | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109779 |
<i>What I meant was that I have a supplier who delivers both AMD and Inte | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109778 |
Petz, RE:"the "return to Katmai" news from Intel is a blockbusht | Jim McMannis | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109777 |
<i>My regular processor supplier (both AMD and Intel) has up to 900 MHz i | Bert Herman | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109776 |
I need some help here. thread, This Thursday I am going to a speech by IBM | chic_hearne | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109775 |
Tejek, both of those stocks are on my watchlist at Clearstation, both stocks | TimF | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109774 |
John, I agree this is blockbuster news - if true. The thing that worries me i | kash johal | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109773 |
OT In case anyone is looking for some value stocks outside of AMD; FFIV.....p | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109772 |
<i>Tejek.. I believe it is likely the penetration has already begun for b | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109771 |
Tejek re...<<<<<<b>IT managers are buying for 100 | hmaly | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109770 |
GopherBroke: Re: "I remain very long AMD but disagree on the short term. | niceguy767 | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109769 |
<i>IMHO as long as first tier suppliers continue to lineup their AMD mega | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109768 |
boris and thread Does anyone know why SI is doing double, triple and quadruple | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109767 |
I remain very long AMD but disagree on the short term. This is expiry run-up | Gopher Broke | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109766 |
<i>Anyway, one of the worst thing in the investment world is to believe n | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109765 |
Dave - <i><From a purely optimist point of view, it might have been a | ptanner | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109764 |
Chic re <<this was his answer, "I'm on a quest to make sure that | Mani1 | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109763 |
Intel: jobs for life ? or else Chipzilla's litigious nature will again b | Alighieri | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109762 |
<I agree things are changing but much slower than I expected......This weeke | Alighieri | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109761 |
ted: I'm always astonished, how slow such things are changing with respect | boris_a | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109760 |
ted: I'm always astonished, how slow such things are changing with respect | boris_a | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109759 |
<i>I use an online broker, so for advice I have to ask friends that have | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
| 109758 |
<i>Are you aware of ON24 May 1 announcement? AMD Files with SEC to Incre | tejek | - | 5/8/2000 |
