SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
It All Depends on DOJ vs MSFT
An SI Board Since February 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
61 4 0
Emcee:  David Freidenberg Type:  Unmoderated
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11Good observations about Intel... Wednesday, February 14, 2001 2:32 PM ET To: DaDavid Freidenberg-2/15/2001
10I see the same parallels with the IBM case... Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:41 David Freidenberg-2/15/2001
9I never thought of the now apparent lack of leadership... Tuesday, February 13David Freidenberg-2/15/2001
8Since you used to have a DOJvsMSFT thread... Tuesday, February 13, 2001 1:55 AMDavid Freidenberg-2/15/2001
7Upcoming live coverage of oral arguments: Message 15341026David Freidenberg-2/12/2001
6“This case has caused some serious damage as investors realize that when companiDavid Freidenberg-2/12/2001
5I view the DOJ-MSFT decision as a sort of prick to an inflated balloon. BalloonPMS Witch-2/12/2001
4"I don't follow Mr. Softie or the PC sector, so I can't really commDavid Freidenberg-2/12/2001
3David, <i>Given the history of MSFT’s leadership position in the NASDAQ,Raymond Duray-2/11/2001
2Ray, Thanks for your insights on the DOJ issue, which is undoubtedly consideraDavid Freidenberg-2/11/2001
1Hi David, Thanks the thoughtful opening contribution to this thread. While theRaymond Duray-2/10/2001
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):