SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FORE Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12559 26 0 FORE
Emcee:  Pascal A. Mons Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11034 You sound very confident. Who's the buyer? Ericsson, Intel, or? P.S. I hoDiB-3/21/1999
11033 <i>deal done in mid 30's midnight sat.</i> This is serious gooTechAlive-3/21/1999
11032 It's a relatively new buy. He started touting it about one week ago and saNote bene-3/21/1999
11031 <FORE was stalled by the birth of GBit, that was the key difference betwen aKent Rattey-3/21/1999
11030 I hope you are right Jim. If not it has to be soon, Friday was not your typicalG. H.-3/21/1999
11029 deal done in mid 30's midnight sat. go fore longs. Monday news conf. Jim-3/21/1999
11028 Jas, you are in the wrong business. You must publish this post. Actually, it isBoris Reynov-3/20/1999
11027 whaat! jach-3/20/1999
11026 Last 3 months instituitions seem to be buying big time. marketguide.com FORE wjach-3/20/1999
11025 Sure is funnier than the product of public schools system, "ebonics" Alex Raytselsky-3/20/1999
11024 Jas happens to be one of many people on this thread who did not loose the senseAlex Raytselsky-3/20/1999
11023 verrie funnie! jach-3/20/1999
11022 Hello J.C. For starters I did not refer to anyone as Fore bashers, as you stateG. H.-3/20/1999
11021 $12 - $22? Well, you're 1/2 right! $12 is very doable on the downside, bujohn dodson-3/20/1999
11020 Murphy is good to stir up some interest in his standard tech stocks, which incljohn dodson-3/20/1999
11019 Anna, what you have said makes a lot of sense, because the buying imbalance haAlex Raytselsky-3/20/1999
11018 Oh yes, the Monopoly $$$ Alex Raytselsky-3/20/1999
11017 Isn't it strange though that quite a few of those rumors pop up at option eAnnaInVA-3/20/1999
11016 Sorry Jach, this is not what happened. In 97 ASND crashed. A good part of theIbor-3/20/1999
11015 <The extent of their investment is the pile of $10 checks that Granny gave tjach-3/20/1999
11014 Jas, who started this thread??? When was this 1996? The more things changAlex Raytselsky-3/20/1999
11013 Every time FORE makes a positive move, several people come forward to characterjas cooper-3/20/1999
11012 A real horse race techstocks.comKent Rattey-3/20/1999
11011 >>>> john dodson (11005 ) From: Note bene Luke-3/20/1999
11010 IF the rumor is true...the upside is about 5 points. if it fails to pan out thTim Luke-3/20/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News