SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Commerce One Inc - (CMRC)
An SI Board Since June 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1938 71 0 CMRC
Emcee:  Mohan Marette Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1113 Nice analysis....http://www.smartmoney.com/smt/markets/news/index.cfm?story=200puborectalis-4/11/2000
1112 Stephen, That news regarding a new portal agreement confirms that there's Kashish King-4/11/2000
1111 SEOUL, April 10 (Reuters) - LG International Corp <01120.KS> said on Mondpuborectalis-4/10/2000
1110 Marshall, Larry is using SQL as the back-end workhorse providing his customersKashish King-4/10/2000
1109 pruguy, In the e-link conference today, one executive from C1 was asked about tStockman_77079-4/6/2000
1108 Commerce One (NASDAQ:CMRC - news), the leader in global e-commerce solutions puborectalis-4/4/2000
1107 Alert: Commerce One Says Promotes Robert Kimmitt to Pres From COO (NasdaqNM:CMRpuborectalis-4/3/2000
1106 LLCool..I'm with you... A trader friend down the street just told me Naz fuPatherzen-4/2/2000
1105 Hi LLCool You said: If they were buying for clients, then they obviouslyPruguy-4/2/2000
1104 Path, I meant Morgan Stanley. I really could care less what JP Morgan does orLLCoolG-4/2/2000
1103 LLCoolG...JP Morgan rates CMRC a buy! Just for added info. PatherzenPatherzen-4/1/2000
1102 Pru, You are preaching to the choir. I don't know whether they were buyinLLCoolG-4/1/2000
1101 Note that ARBA didn't even make the Forbes list. This is a buying opportunHawkmoon-4/1/2000
1100 Hi LLcool: You said: I guess the only big problem I really had with that whole Pruguy-4/1/2000
1099 CMRC =#9 on Forbes Top 20 Listhttp://www.forbes.com/asap/00/0403/84b.htm Read Patherzen-4/1/2000
1098 All, The problem lies more with the fact that in-depth analysis of all of the LLCoolG-4/1/2000
1097 Here is a link to a more positive cut on Crook's comments: ragingbull.com Hands Off-4/1/2000
1096 Stockman, I am more than happy to discuss this with you. I am not speaking forPruguy-4/1/2000
1095 How about a different point of view: What has changed about Commerce One back Stockman_77079-4/1/2000
1094 Another point of view: Net Notes: Commerce One's Continued Strength gomez.Diana-4/1/2000
1093 maybe you are the wrong. I follow them to sometimes and have generally had grePruguy-4/1/2000
1092 Stephen, but isn't Commerce One getting partial ownership of the new companStockman_77079-4/1/2000
1091 then there must be a lot of idiotsStockman_77079-4/1/2000
1090 Only the idiot will listen to Prudential. They are wrong most of time. I fellowsmartinvestor_290-3/31/2000
1089 Steve Harmon was just on CNBC touting CMRC. lindaLOGAN12-3/31/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News