SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Z PORTFOLIO
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
11568 63 0
Emcee:  Ron McKinnon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11493Its not weird. It is just another case of how screwed up the market is and how tBWAC-2/2/2004
11492This whole situation with MTXX looks really weird. Can't one just call FDA aaniela-2/2/2004
11491According to Matrixx, the whole thing was BS and could have been orchestrated byDanZ-2/2/2004
11490<B>Dan is a liar Message 19753971StockDung-1/31/2004
11489agreed...go PATS <g>Carl Worth-1/31/2004
11488Carl, Dan and others. i suggest that we not respond in any way to posts such asLarry S.-1/31/2004
11487you can't answer a simple question, you call someone a liar who clearly is nCarl Worth-1/31/2004
11486<B>.=DJ : FDA Looks Into Complaints About Zicam By Carol S. Remond StockDung-1/31/2004
11485<B>Dan, you are wrong about Plantiff in first case. He was not taking any StockDung-1/30/2004
11484I won't have Internet access again this weekend. Will try to update the porDanZ-1/30/2004
11483I agree. Just ignore him. I do not know what his goal is but he has polluted othaniela-1/30/2004
11482i think it would be better if we hacked into his portfolio and made it 100% longLarry S.-1/30/2004
11481Dan instead of responding why not put the creature on ignore? would save a lot Ron McKinnon-1/30/2004
11480Here Dan homeowatch.org nbwhere does it say he was taking three other prescriptiStockDung-1/30/2004
11479Find it. Stop makin things upStockDung-1/30/2004
11478I posted a link on Yahoo several weeks (months?) ago to back this up. If I get DanZ-1/30/2004
11477Dan, back up this statement? "The shorts also fail to mention that <B>StockDung-1/30/2004
11476buy 100 SNDK 55.80 eomLarry S.-1/30/2004
11475The anosmia issue isn't new to me or anyone that knows anything about MatrixDanZ-1/30/2004
11474i didn't get a fill on DRL today, so i have no buy price to report <g>Carl Worth-1/30/2004
11473out of curiosity, is there a reason you feel the need to YELL in 95% of your posCarl Worth-1/29/2004
11472<B>Dan, have you calculated in zimmreed.comzicam-attorneys.com into your eStockDung-1/29/2004
11471Cover the rest of my VSH at 22.59. Buy 2,000 MTXX 13.05. No way this stock is DanZ-1/29/2004
11470Cover 1,000 VSH at 22.84 and 22.75 (average 22.795). I put a trailing stop (.15DanZ-1/29/2004
11469damn the torpedoes, full speed backwards, ggg. it does seem a bit high here. laLarry S.-1/29/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):