SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Complacency Indexes
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1487 37 0
Emcee:  TechTrader42 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1162ST Naz CI: 1.791 9.905 MT Naz CI: 1.791 9.905 LT Naz CI: 38.185 42.580 ST S&TechTrader42-5/6/2002
1161Divergence with Naz CI and Naz composite this morning, not surprisingly. ST NaTechTrader42-5/6/2002
1160Perhaps you should listen to the CC. Just did so myself. Very bullish. Multiple MechanicalMethod-5/5/2002
1159Decision Point reports that the GAAP P/E for the S&P as of May 3 was 42.1. TTechTrader42-5/4/2002
1158ST Naz CI: 0.336 13.579 MT Naz CI: 0.336 13.579 LT Naz CI: 40.639 52.511 ST S&aTechTrader42-5/3/2002
1157ST Naz CI: 1.570 13.579 MT Naz CI: 1.570 13.579 LT Naz CI: 41.267 52.511 ST S&aTechTrader42-5/3/2002
1156It was that support level for AMAT around 5 that slapped me out of my daze, MontTechTrader42-5/3/2002
1155I don't think a lot of people realize how overbought the market was during tMonty Lenard-5/3/2002
1154It broke through the 50, of course, so that'll be the next stop -- the 200. TechTrader42-5/2/2002
1153Hmmm....and that is just above the -1/8. That could be a great trade there if iMonty Lenard-5/2/2002
1152New eSignal custom formula site, with charts: tssupport.comTechTrader42-5/2/2002
1151Is the AJC countdown coinciding with the Fed release? Did she do that so we wouajtj99-5/2/2002
1150I rilly couldn't say, AJ. (You might think so, but I couldn't possibly cTechTrader42-5/2/2002
1149Yeah, I saw that later on, Brooke. I agree with your sucker run theory. We'ajtj99-5/2/2002
1148Look where the 200 is in AMAT's chart.TechTrader42-5/2/2002
1147The Naz didn't quite hold, AJ. The low moved lower, by .17.TechTrader42-5/2/2002
1146Brooke, this is long after the fact but if you want to see a 3 Mountain Top (TexMonty Lenard-5/2/2002
1145LOL...you need to move to the other thread if you believe that. Very funny! MMonty Lenard-5/2/2002
1144The dec vol was also greater (not by much) on the nyse. MontyMonty Lenard-5/2/2002
1143Brooke, NDX breached support, Naz held. I think they painted it to hold and hopajtj99-5/2/2002
1142Yes, you're absolutely right, MechanicalMethod. But stochRSI is old hat. YouTechTrader42-5/2/2002
1141<i>>>Speaking of support, take a look at the NDX in the daily. A newMechanicalMethod-5/2/2002
1140Speaking of support, take a look at the NDX in the daily. A new low today.TechTrader42-5/2/2002
1139The Adv/Dec vol. figure is amazingly dismal -- and not reflected in the issues rTechTrader42-5/2/2002
1138Brooke, the comp has as close to a tweezer bottom as I have seen since going to Monty Lenard-5/2/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News