SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Technical Analysis - Beginners
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
12039 217 0
Emcee:  gonzongo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11764Wishful Thinking© - I'm glad to see the new product line has been rollMichael Watkins-3/22/2001
11763I've skimmed it. Some interesting quotes in there: "The market is veryTechTrader42-3/22/2001
11762Hello Brooke, Did you read the interview with Victor Niederhoffer in the currenSmooth Drive-3/22/2001
11761"Rough support" is putting it mildly. It's fallen through the 50 STechTrader42-3/22/2001
11760noticed a gap on MO on 1/5/01 at 40 1/4 about if overall trend is down, the gapChris-3/22/2001
11759low of MO hit rough support. 40-41ish.. so we getting a bounce. expect bounce Chris-3/22/2001
11758<i>"Technical analysis is not about prediction"</I> GenerTechTrader42-3/22/2001
11757I agree that lots of stocks could become BB stocks. I just saw a New Yorker cartTechTrader42-3/22/2001
11756I suspected we'd find agreement on MOT. MOT draws combatants together in itsTechTrader42-3/22/2001
11755Its stocks like that which make shorting so rewarding.Michael Watkins-3/22/2001
11754It might be good to also look at the S&P 500... ottographs.com Disclaimer:Michael Watkins-3/22/2001
11753Well to put it too you squarely, the analyist are most of the problem. CNBC is tRonald P. Margraf Sr.-3/22/2001
11752Hay Brook, don't take it so personal. Just trying to strike up some interestRonald P. Margraf Sr.-3/22/2001
11751I'll Let you think about your last post. I really don't see MOT topping Ronald P. Margraf Sr.-3/22/2001
11750Chris, I'll agree with that. I see the Dow going to 5000 an the Nasdq goinRonald P. Margraf Sr.-3/22/2001
11749Thanks MM. Am still learning the ropes but I don't think it would be too difB. Thomson-3/21/2001
11748Ok, I can't just enter a glib response :) ottographs.com 5 min chart; was Michael Watkins-3/21/2001
11747Gee, that's about the same time that I was exiting my trades! :) Of course,Michael Watkins-3/21/2001
11746Ron, LOL I think the average Canadian is no more likely to be short than the avMichael Watkins-3/21/2001
11745Well I think its all risk management in the end. We can play the 'Chips'Michael Watkins-3/21/2001
11744Well I look at it this way.. Once the price is near or at a support area.. I'Dick Brown-3/21/2001
11743orcl analysis done couple weeks ago. (feels like years ago) Message 15445577 alChris-3/21/2001
11742look at nsm.. and even on weekly chart. again, all looks good but we need sox Chris-3/21/2001
11741Hit CSCO on the nail, too, ya know. T'ain't all guessing, as that skeptiTechTrader42-3/21/2001
11740looking at mot, not much basing action (that fits my timeframe) on daily scale. Chris-3/21/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News