SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Moomin Valley (formerly Troll-free Zone)
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2852 27 0 QQQQ
Emcee:  Moominoid Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1177This is a count that could work? rpi.edu It sues your idea that that B wave isMoominoid-10/12/2005
1176Looks like it will work, though still Erev Yom Kippur :?PMoominoid-10/12/2005
1175Yu're doing the "sell Rosh Hashana - buy Yom Kippur" thing?... -g.skinowski-10/12/2005
1174That's what it looks like. Yes I think the bounce won't last long becausMoominoid-10/12/2005
1173It is entirely possible that all this action of the last week is some sort of a skinowski-10/12/2005
1172I just reversed to completely long on my US trading account: QQQQ, HHH, HANS, AMoominoid-10/12/2005
1171Now long both WLS and AAPL. Beta up to 0.41. Again covered AAPL to soon and wentMoominoid-10/11/2005
1170I saw that too. They get that the old telecom model is dead. Not all telecom firMoominoid-10/11/2005
1169I don't know what they "get", but one thing they got was spectrum Maurice Winn-10/11/2005
1168Thanks that is interesting - hmmm they are making a big deal about switching to Moominoid-10/11/2005
1167Telecom NZ is not likely to reach much beyond NZ and the AAPT effort came a gutsMaurice Winn-10/11/2005
1166Then I went long WLS @ 122.15 AH action on CHCI looks good for my trade. As theMoominoid-10/10/2005
1165Just covered WLS at 125.09. I expect housing stocks will eeventually be lower thMoominoid-10/10/2005
1164The Aus market has definitely topped out. But a wave 2 could retrace almost backMoominoid-10/9/2005
11635ths are notorious for failing, that's true. I still think - until proven skinowski-10/9/2005
1162You're welcome. As a wave 5 can be very small following a triangle this is vMoominoid-10/9/2005
1161oops... Yes, that's the one. I see I even got a little bit of the credit..skinowski-10/9/2005
1160I think conventional nomenclature should be maintained... otherwise communicatioskinowski-10/9/2005
1159I got it! :) rpi.edu That is very possible IMO. We need to get 1475 on NDX inMoominoid-10/9/2005
1158<i>LOL! D., we kind of going in circles... I see your ED on SPX, and have Moominoid-10/9/2005
1157LOL! D., we kind of going in circles... I see your ED on SPX, and have been trskinowski-10/9/2005
1156<i>I didn't "suggest" the triangle scenario </i> You Moominoid-10/9/2005
1155ED is a motive wave, and a triangle is corrective, so, the convention is that thskinowski-10/9/2005
1154No - I am labeling an ED. Does iii have to be higher than i in an ED? The triaMoominoid-10/8/2005
1153D., if your weekly NDX read is correct, you should label your triangle as abcde,skinowski-10/8/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News