| Reply | Message Preview | From | Recs | Posted |
| 119057 | <i><AMD closed at 84 1/4; up 7....now do you know what I meant about af | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119056 | RE:"At any rate, my money is on one of two things: (1) power supply (2) mob | Jim McMannis | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119055 | re: "So do you conclude that the Pentium II has "problems" and sh | DRBES | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119054 | Re: "Why do we see motherboards qualified up to speed X, and no higher?&quo | Elmer | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119053 | <i>Intel buying back shares is GREAT ! Look at what a GREAT INVESTMENT it | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119052 | <i>Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the syste | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119051 | Re: In any event, I would feel uneasy, whether I were Gateway or AMD... Tony, | Dan3 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119050 | It hasn't left, so i'm not the only person being punished. | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119049 | Elmer, it is my understanding that CPU frequency does indeed affect the demands | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119048 | Re: "You think splitting the stock and then doing a buyback program is grea | Elmer | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119047 | Re: "Because the L2 operates at much higher speeds the propagation of signa | Elmer | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119046 | Bunny ran a 900MHZ core classic at 1120MHZ and an 800MHZ Thunderbird at 1104MHZ | Dan3 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119045 | <i>Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the syste | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119044 | <i>Intel buying back shares is GREAT ! Look at what a GREAT INVESTMENT it | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119043 | <i>Ted Paul implied it. Sorry I didn't mean it myself(eom</I> M | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119042 | <i>Ted Paul implied it. Sorry I didn't mean it myself(eom</I> M | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119041 | <i>Intel buying back shares is GREAT ! Look at what a GREAT INVESTMENT it | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119040 | <i>Intel buying back shares is GREAT ! Look at what a GREAT INVESTMENT it | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119039 | Propagation delays and capacitive coupling "<i>Why would 1GHz TBirds | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119038 | Propagation delays and capicitive coupling "<i>Why would 1GHz TBirds | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119037 | ++Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the system does | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119036 | Yeah, see my follow-up, Tony: I allowed that the only possible objection I coul | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119035 | <i>Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the syste | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119034 | Milo, Re "Jim other vendors are using 1Ghz with no problems” What vendors a | herb will | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119033 | <i>Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the syste | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119032 | <i>Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the syste | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119031 | <i>Ted Paul implied it. Sorry I didn't mean it myself(eom</I> M | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119030 | Milo, Re "Jim other vendors are using 1Ghz with no problems” What vendors a | herb will | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119029 | Re: But the system just is not up to standard.... Well, there's one standar | Dan3 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119028 | Milo, Re "Jim other vendors are using 1Ghz with no problems” What vendors a | herb will | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119027 | Propagation delays and capicitive coupling "<i>Why would 1GHz TBirds | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119026 | Yeah, see my follow-up, Tony: I allowed that the only possible objection I coul | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119025 | Propagation delays and capacitive coupling "<i>Why would 1GHz TBirds | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119024 | Elmer...Here's a little message sent to Engel yesterday. siliconinvestor.co | eplace | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119023 | Propagation delays and capacitive coupling "<i>Why would 1GHz TBirds | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119022 | Nice post from the MF board, boards.fool.com Mani | Mani1 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119021 | <i>Ted Paul implied it. Sorry I didn't mean it myself(eom</I> M | tejek | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119020 | Mani, Re: "Yes, go to a Gateway Country Store near you!" Yes Mani .. | Yousef | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119019 | Elmer...Here's a post to Engel from last night. siliconinvestor.com Paul, | eplace | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119018 | Re: "Once again, pull the 1 GHz Tbirds from the flaky Gateway systems, and | Elmer | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119017 | Yeah, see my follow-up, Tony: I allowed that the only possible objection I coul | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119016 | Re: "I could believe (given Gateway's issue) that the 750 may be at its | Elmer | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119015 | Disaster Could Endanger Chip Industry Japanese plant explosion crimps supply of | FJB | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119014 | Doug, ><i>Besides, I say again, how hard is this: (1) Receive flaky Ga | Tony Viola | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119013 | Milo, My point was there are many Stable MB using 1Ghz Tbirds... I suspect the | Jim McMannis | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119012 | RE:"You seem to be enjoying yourself." Rambus is our friend... Jim | Jim McMannis | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119011 | I agree Slot Tbird and Socket T-bird have electrical differences to MB. Milo | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119010 | Doug, <i>And of course, there's an even simpler possibility. Power su | Bert Herman | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119009 | Jim K, sorry, but AMD *has* publicly discounted the Tbird as a source of the pro | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119008 | Jim K, No I asserted that *if* those tests were performed it would provide a | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119007 | If the problem can be fixed by swaping the 1000 Mhz Thunderbird with the 1000 Mh | RDM | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119006 | ROCK STABLE @ 1100Mhz " Article Info Overclocking AMD's Thunderbird | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119005 | I agree with you completely. Further, I suspect that their R&D suffers grave | DRBES | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119004 | Interesting! Certainly worth looking into. | jim kelley | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119003 | Your method is well short of the scientific method. You are asserting that the T | jim kelley | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119002 | Jim my point was there are many Stable MB using 1Ghz Tbirds Here you can surmise | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119001 | You seem to be enjoying yourself. <G> | jim kelley | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 119000 | Like I said it is probably a systems problem (and you seem to be agreeing). But | jim kelley | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118999 | I do not think that has anything to do with my point. Perhaps, you are referring | jim kelley | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118998 | Jim(s), Re: If the problem can be fixed by swaping the 1000 Mhz Thunderbird with | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118997 | Chuck, thanks for the link- It looks less than ideal, but not bad. As you point | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118996 | RE:"Jim didn't INTC make i820? It did help..... AMD that is..." D | Jim McMannis | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118995 | Jim other vendors are using 1Ghz with no problems. GTW using it's own custom | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118994 | Jim K., have you heard of the 'Scientific Method'? Here's a hint: 7t | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118993 | re: "bored by" <B>BORING.</B> Actually no offense was in | DRBES | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118992 | If the problem can be fixed by swaping the 1000 Mhz Thunderbird with the 1000 Mh | Jim McMannis | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118991 | Your reasoning is flawed. The requirements for running at 900 MHZ are less strin | jim kelley | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118990 | Valueman, not too bad for a prototype board-- but a prototype it clearly is, as | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118989 | Doug, <Would you provide more detail on this? I'm not disputing what you | Charles R | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118988 | Systems problems are not that simple. Now we do not know if it is a true systems | jim kelley | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118987 | Chuck, yeah, you're probably right. Gotta love the $3.12 whisper, though! M | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118986 | If it was T-bird the problem would occur on all GTW systems. GTW still selling | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118985 | Jim didn't INTC make i820? It did help..... AMD that is... Milo | milo_morai | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118984 | gamepc.com More on stability, or not | Valueman | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118983 | Jim K., Re: We do not know. Well, as I've said, I expect AMD does know. Ga | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118982 | What do you think it is? | jim kelley | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118981 | Doug, <Is it possible the commitment to produce extra classics to help use u | Charles R | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118980 | Jim, I just thought you might have an "informed" opinion on the subjec | Jim McMannis | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118979 | Charles, Re: it is clear that motherboard makers have been having problems getti | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118978 | OT, More inflation creeping in...will be interesting to see how much the economy | Jim McMannis | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118977 | Spoken like a true AMDroid. <G> | jim kelley | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118976 | Not really! It is common for companies to deny responsibility for a glitch in a | jim kelley | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118975 | Charles, thanks. Good points, all. How about my one other question: Is it poss | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118974 | Doug, <But this rules out Gateway's 1 GHz troubles as the source of the | Charles R | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118973 | Doug, <Why do you think KT133 will have much impact on Q2 earnings?> Bec | Charles R | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118972 | OT: Well, it's not in OPEC's best interests to drive the West into an in | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118971 | Doug, RE:"Saudi Arabia commits to driving crude prices down to $25/barrel.& | Jim McMannis | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118970 | <Intel buying back shares is GREAT !> Certainly, certainly :) Intel sell | Ali Chen | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118969 | Interesting re: Gateway using Al tbirds so far. I agree: it's because they | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118968 | Doug, <I replied to CNet and copied Toni-- let's see what we hear back&g | Charles R | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118967 | Why do you think KT133 will have much impact on Q2 earnings? Gateway, for insta | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118966 | survivin, <CNET story on the GTWY problem> Thanks for posting. <He d | Charles R | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118965 | Slightly OT: more good news on the oil/inflation front: dailynews.yahoo.com Sa | dougSF30 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118964 | Ted, <AMD closed at 84 1/4; up 7....now do you know what I meant about after | Charles R | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118963 | Paulie: Re: "AMD can't do it because they historically have been LOSIN | niceguy767 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118962 | Goutama, <To all: Q2 EPS Contest> This quarter's contest has become | Charles R | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118961 | Re: "Didn't Intel sell its PLD division to Altera?" Yes they did, | Elmer | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118960 | Jim, when are you going to learn to comment about subject which you have actuall | Mani1 | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118959 | AIl - re: "I guess it is time to remind you about enormous stock buy-backs | Paul Engel | - | 7/3/2000 |
| 118958 | Jim - RE: "You can expect more problems like this as the clock rate increas | Cirruslvr | - | 7/3/2000 |