SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1593374 523 0
Emcee:  Duncan Baird Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
119057<i><AMD closed at 84 1/4; up 7....now do you know what I meant about aftejek-7/3/2000
119056RE:"At any rate, my money is on one of two things: (1) power supply (2) mobJim McMannis-7/3/2000
119055re: "So do you conclude that the Pentium II has "problems" and shDRBES-7/3/2000
119054Re: "Why do we see motherboards qualified up to speed X, and no higher?&quoElmer-7/3/2000
119053<i>Intel buying back shares is GREAT ! Look at what a GREAT INVESTMENT ittejek-7/3/2000
119052<i>Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the systetejek-7/3/2000
119051Re: In any event, I would feel uneasy, whether I were Gateway or AMD... Tony, Dan3-7/3/2000
119050It hasn't left, so i'm not the only person being punished.milo_morai-7/3/2000
119049Elmer, it is my understanding that CPU frequency does indeed affect the demands dougSF30-7/3/2000
119048Re: "You think splitting the stock and then doing a buyback program is greaElmer-7/3/2000
119047Re: "Because the L2 operates at much higher speeds the propagation of signaElmer-7/3/2000
119046Bunny ran a 900MHZ core classic at 1120MHZ and an 800MHZ Thunderbird at 1104MHZ Dan3-7/3/2000
119045<i>Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the systetejek-7/3/2000
119044<i>Intel buying back shares is GREAT ! Look at what a GREAT INVESTMENT ittejek-7/3/2000
119043<i>Ted Paul implied it. Sorry I didn't mean it myself(eom</I> Mtejek-7/3/2000
119042<i>Ted Paul implied it. Sorry I didn't mean it myself(eom</I> Mtejek-7/3/2000
119041<i>Intel buying back shares is GREAT ! Look at what a GREAT INVESTMENT ittejek-7/3/2000
119040<i>Intel buying back shares is GREAT ! Look at what a GREAT INVESTMENT ittejek-7/3/2000
119039Propagation delays and capacitive coupling "<i>Why would 1GHz TBirds milo_morai-7/3/2000
119038Propagation delays and capicitive coupling "<i>Why would 1GHz TBirds milo_morai-7/3/2000
119037++Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the system does tejek-7/3/2000
119036Yeah, see my follow-up, Tony: I allowed that the only possible objection I couldougSF30-7/3/2000
119035<i>Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the systetejek-7/3/2000
119034Milo, Re "Jim other vendors are using 1Ghz with no problems” What vendors aherb will-7/3/2000
119033<i>Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the systetejek-7/3/2000
119032<i>Sure but these problems take time. The user does not care why the systetejek-7/3/2000
119031<i>Ted Paul implied it. Sorry I didn't mean it myself(eom</I> Mtejek-7/3/2000
119030Milo, Re "Jim other vendors are using 1Ghz with no problems” What vendors aherb will-7/3/2000
119029Re: But the system just is not up to standard.... Well, there's one standarDan3-7/3/2000
119028Milo, Re "Jim other vendors are using 1Ghz with no problems” What vendors aherb will-7/3/2000
119027Propagation delays and capicitive coupling "<i>Why would 1GHz TBirds milo_morai-7/3/2000
119026Yeah, see my follow-up, Tony: I allowed that the only possible objection I couldougSF30-7/3/2000
119025Propagation delays and capacitive coupling "<i>Why would 1GHz TBirds milo_morai-7/3/2000
119024Elmer...Here's a little message sent to Engel yesterday. siliconinvestor.coeplace-7/3/2000
119023Propagation delays and capacitive coupling "<i>Why would 1GHz TBirds milo_morai-7/3/2000
119022Nice post from the MF board, boards.fool.com ManiMani1-7/3/2000
119021<i>Ted Paul implied it. Sorry I didn't mean it myself(eom</I> Mtejek-7/3/2000
119020Mani, Re: "Yes, go to a Gateway Country Store near you!" Yes Mani ..Yousef-7/3/2000
119019Elmer...Here's a post to Engel from last night. siliconinvestor.com Paul, eplace-7/3/2000
119018Re: "Once again, pull the 1 GHz Tbirds from the flaky Gateway systems, and Elmer-7/3/2000
119017Yeah, see my follow-up, Tony: I allowed that the only possible objection I couldougSF30-7/3/2000
119016Re: "I could believe (given Gateway's issue) that the 750 may be at itsElmer-7/3/2000
119015Disaster Could Endanger Chip Industry Japanese plant explosion crimps supply ofFJB-7/3/2000
119014Doug, ><i>Besides, I say again, how hard is this: (1) Receive flaky GaTony Viola-7/3/2000
119013Milo, My point was there are many Stable MB using 1Ghz Tbirds... I suspect the Jim McMannis-7/3/2000
119012RE:"You seem to be enjoying yourself." Rambus is our friend... JimJim McMannis-7/3/2000
119011I agree Slot Tbird and Socket T-bird have electrical differences to MB. Milomilo_morai-7/3/2000
119010Doug, <i>And of course, there's an even simpler possibility. Power suBert Herman-7/3/2000
119009Jim K, sorry, but AMD *has* publicly discounted the Tbird as a source of the prodougSF30-7/3/2000
119008Jim K, No I asserted that *if* those tests were performed it would provide a dougSF30-7/3/2000
119007If the problem can be fixed by swaping the 1000 Mhz Thunderbird with the 1000 MhRDM-7/3/2000
119006ROCK STABLE @ 1100Mhz " Article Info Overclocking AMD's Thunderbirdmilo_morai-7/3/2000
119005I agree with you completely. Further, I suspect that their R&D suffers graveDRBES-7/3/2000
119004Interesting! Certainly worth looking into.jim kelley-7/3/2000
119003Your method is well short of the scientific method. You are asserting that the Tjim kelley-7/3/2000
119002Jim my point was there are many Stable MB using 1Ghz Tbirds Here you can surmisemilo_morai-7/3/2000
119001You seem to be enjoying yourself. <G>jim kelley-7/3/2000
119000Like I said it is probably a systems problem (and you seem to be agreeing). But jim kelley-7/3/2000
118999I do not think that has anything to do with my point. Perhaps, you are referringjim kelley-7/3/2000
118998Jim(s), Re: If the problem can be fixed by swaping the 1000 Mhz Thunderbird withdougSF30-7/3/2000
118997Chuck, thanks for the link- It looks less than ideal, but not bad. As you pointdougSF30-7/3/2000
118996RE:"Jim didn't INTC make i820? It did help..... AMD that is..." DJim McMannis-7/3/2000
118995Jim other vendors are using 1Ghz with no problems. GTW using it's own custommilo_morai-7/3/2000
118994Jim K., have you heard of the 'Scientific Method'? Here's a hint: 7tdougSF30-7/3/2000
118993re: "bored by" <B>BORING.</B> Actually no offense was inDRBES-7/3/2000
118992If the problem can be fixed by swaping the 1000 Mhz Thunderbird with the 1000 MhJim McMannis-7/3/2000
118991Your reasoning is flawed. The requirements for running at 900 MHZ are less strinjim kelley-7/3/2000
118990Valueman, not too bad for a prototype board-- but a prototype it clearly is, as dougSF30-7/3/2000
118989Doug, <Would you provide more detail on this? I'm not disputing what youCharles R-7/3/2000
118988Systems problems are not that simple. Now we do not know if it is a true systemsjim kelley-7/3/2000
118987Chuck, yeah, you're probably right. Gotta love the $3.12 whisper, though! MdougSF30-7/3/2000
118986If it was T-bird the problem would occur on all GTW systems. GTW still selling milo_morai-7/3/2000
118985Jim didn't INTC make i820? It did help..... AMD that is... Milomilo_morai-7/3/2000
118984gamepc.com More on stability, or notValueman-7/3/2000
118983Jim K., Re: We do not know. Well, as I've said, I expect AMD does know. GadougSF30-7/3/2000
118982What do you think it is?jim kelley-7/3/2000
118981Doug, <Is it possible the commitment to produce extra classics to help use uCharles R-7/3/2000
118980Jim, I just thought you might have an "informed" opinion on the subjecJim McMannis-7/3/2000
118979Charles, Re: it is clear that motherboard makers have been having problems gettidougSF30-7/3/2000
118978OT, More inflation creeping in...will be interesting to see how much the economyJim McMannis-7/3/2000
118977Spoken like a true AMDroid. <G>jim kelley-7/3/2000
118976Not really! It is common for companies to deny responsibility for a glitch in a jim kelley-7/3/2000
118975Charles, thanks. Good points, all. How about my one other question: Is it possdougSF30-7/3/2000
118974Doug, <But this rules out Gateway's 1 GHz troubles as the source of the Charles R-7/3/2000
118973Doug, <Why do you think KT133 will have much impact on Q2 earnings?> BecCharles R-7/3/2000
118972OT: Well, it's not in OPEC's best interests to drive the West into an indougSF30-7/3/2000
118971Doug, RE:"Saudi Arabia commits to driving crude prices down to $25/barrel.&Jim McMannis-7/3/2000
118970<Intel buying back shares is GREAT !> Certainly, certainly :) Intel sellAli Chen-7/3/2000
118969Interesting re: Gateway using Al tbirds so far. I agree: it's because they dougSF30-7/3/2000
118968Doug, <I replied to CNet and copied Toni-- let's see what we hear back&gCharles R-7/3/2000
118967Why do you think KT133 will have much impact on Q2 earnings? Gateway, for instadougSF30-7/3/2000
118966survivin, <CNET story on the GTWY problem> Thanks for posting. <He dCharles R-7/3/2000
118965Slightly OT: more good news on the oil/inflation front: dailynews.yahoo.com SadougSF30-7/3/2000
118964Ted, <AMD closed at 84 1/4; up 7....now do you know what I meant about afterCharles R-7/3/2000
118963Paulie: Re: "AMD can't do it because they historically have been LOSINniceguy767-7/3/2000
118962Goutama, <To all: Q2 EPS Contest> This quarter's contest has become Charles R-7/3/2000
118961Re: "Didn't Intel sell its PLD division to Altera?" Yes they did,Elmer-7/3/2000
118960Jim, when are you going to learn to comment about subject which you have actuallMani1-7/3/2000
118959AIl - re: "I guess it is time to remind you about enormous stock buy-backs Paul Engel-7/3/2000
118958Jim - RE: "You can expect more problems like this as the clock rate increasCirruslvr-7/3/2000
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):