SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
AMD/INTC/RMBS et ALL
An SI Board Since September 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
271 8 0
Emcee:  kash johal Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
121 There is still something funny. There is a hard limit of 32 devices on a Rambugrok-9/24/1999
120 <Something is funny. I've heard that you can't use more than 8 RdramCharles R-9/24/1999
119 oh cool. I hope you guys don't mind me posting here. Kash I believe that Mani1-9/24/1999
118 Someone leaked this to me earlier today. Seems that Intel has website for resegrok-9/24/1999
117 If true, a bombshell.... yahoo.cnet.comCharles R-9/24/1999
116 RE: <Any thoughts on the market fiasco.> Who knows but intc, csco, msft,grok-9/23/1999
115 Thread, Any thoughts on the market fiasco. I bought back my covered calls on kash johal-9/23/1999
114 KZnerd, Re: ground bounce Yes it clearly is not a problem. You could even go kash johal-9/23/1999
113 RE: <Another solution is to phase your outputs with small delays between grogrok-9/23/1999
112 Nice story, Carl. RE: <So the factory solution was to detect when someone wgrok-9/23/1999
111 RE: <<I>Also, what if drams go to x32 by then?</I> Ground bouncegrok-9/23/1999
110 Hi KZNerd; Great post re history of granularity &c. Right on, and well saBilow-9/23/1999
109 Hi Charles R; Re your long/short term use of RDRAM &c... I thought I'Bilow-9/23/1999
108 Hi KZNerd et al; Re RDRAM power consumption... It is obvious to me that RDRAMBilow-9/23/1999
107 KZNerd, <i>Also, what if drams go to x32 by then? </i> Ground bouJohn Walliker-9/23/1999
106 <i>In the graphics market - It may be a small player - but embedded SRAM dumbmoney-9/22/1999
105 RE: "<Now for computers smaller than PCs (or those not using Microsoft grok-9/22/1999
104 KZ, <Now for computers smaller than PCs (or those not using Microsoft softwCharles R-9/22/1999
103 Charles, I think that Rambus' advantages come out in the granularity/pin_cgrok-9/22/1999
102 Charles, Re: "Rambus potential" Well it all comes down to performankash johal-9/22/1999
101 Thread, I have spent a decent chunk of time on the post about RDRAM near-termCharles R-9/22/1999
100 Kash, <Great post.> Thanks. <Seems to me that Rambus has lost if ACharles R-9/22/1999
99 <i>Weren't you the guy talking about shorting AMD on Rambus thread a unclewest-9/22/1999
98 Chuck, Great post. Seems to me that Rambus has lost if Ashok's reading iskash johal-9/22/1999
97 Thread, <Once we hear the other side of this saga, we can cut the religion Charles R-9/21/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News