SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FORE Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12559 26 0 FORE
Emcee:  Pascal A. Mons Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12409 It certainly not the first time that this occurs and it will not be the last tiJoseph A. Aboaf-5/14/1999
12408 all is relative... If you have one share, it's one dollar, 10 shares 10 dolJoseph A. Aboaf-5/14/1999
12407 no, as upside is 1$ and potential downside can be ten times more than that; hadjach-5/14/1999
12406 I'm not going to bust a vein over it but it is disappointing at best. They J. Plesha-5/14/1999
12405 I wouldn't be shocked to see someone try to get an injunction against the tWTSherman-5/14/1999
12404 You know I really hate shareholder lawsuits but I'm willing to make an exceJ. Plesha-5/14/1999
12403 <i>"And you can't 'untender' them now."</i> Elmer Flugum-5/14/1999
12402 John, there is little chance the deal falls through. If the deal were at all igbh-5/14/1999
12401 Ray: IBM is a huge and respected company and they are a bunch of whatevers. BuJohn F. Dowd-5/14/1999
12400 Jas: Couldn't agree with you more but since we didn't have all the factJohn F. Dowd-5/14/1999
12399 <i>What if there is fraud and GEC backs out?</i> Fore goes back togbh-5/14/1999
12398 <i>Re TLAB - You and me both! </i> And Mr. Gore. And I'm sure jas cooper-5/14/1999
12397 I predict you'll see lawsuits filed by next week on this. Something like tWTSherman-5/14/1999
12396 <i> What positive scenario do you foresee for those who don't tender jas cooper-5/14/1999
12395 Re TLAB - You and me both! LakesideTrader-5/14/1999
12394 <i>If there is a redoing of this deal it will be for all shareholders rejas cooper-5/14/1999
12393 What if there is fraud and GEC backs out? w2j2-5/14/1999
12392 JFD: Yes, I agree. GEC PL is a huge an respected company it is hard for Riskmgmt-5/14/1999
12391 Paul, After the tender is completed the deliverable on the call options are noTavros-5/14/1999
12390 JAS: If there is a redoing of this deal it will be for all shareholders regardJohn F. Dowd-5/14/1999
12389 What positive scenario do you foresee for those who don't tender their sharLakesideTrader-5/14/1999
12388 <i>I too have tendered my shares but had I known of this I would not havjas cooper-5/14/1999
12387 Thank you so much for posting the WSJ article. MOST interesting article. I guLakesideTrader-5/14/1999
12386 To Ray and ALL: This might be the reason they did the GEC deal. Maybe GEC turJohn F. Dowd-5/14/1999
12385 <i> I'm not sure the extra point from here is worth holding for</Riskmgmt-5/14/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News