SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
14610 39 0
Emcee:  Original Mad Dog Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12735The gov't opened a pandora's box when they decided to endorse a religiouJorj X Mckie-2/24/2004
12734One other thing. Don't worry - Even if you can't marry Smithee we stillAugustus Gloop-2/24/2004
12733then we agree :) indegayforum.org Privatize Marriage: A simple solution to thMulhollandDrive-2/24/2004
12732yup, was watching dennis miller last night and it was brought up that the polyamJorj X Mckie-2/24/2004
12731that is my whole argument....either get in the business without prejudice or getJorj X Mckie-2/24/2004
12730<<Other than to facilitate the legal issues that arise when one or more peAugustus Gloop-2/24/2004
12729<i>The gay community is demanding non-discriminatory application of the laMulhollandDrive-2/24/2004
12728<i>The State and Federal governments should either get out of the marriageMulhollandDrive-2/24/2004
12727The gay community is demanding non-discriminatory application of the laws. SeeJorj X Mckie-2/24/2004
12726LOL!!! Bastage!Jorj X Mckie-2/24/2004
12725The State and Federal governments should either get out of the marriage businessJorj X Mckie-2/24/2004
12724Do people really think that this will help to change a gay or lesbian person'MulhollandDrive-2/24/2004
12723Edit: Message 19842982Alan Smithee-2/24/2004
12722i think the problem is with the full faith and credit clause of the constitutionMulhollandDrive-2/24/2004
12721Actually, I can see a way to make this a constitutional issue. See my post to Jorj X Mckie-2/24/2004
12720my opinion on the issue is that it is none of my business if two men, two women Jorj X Mckie-2/24/2004
12719Edit: <i>I am now officially in the anti-bush crowd.</i> You were Alan Smithee-2/24/2004
12718<i>it is to limit the power of the government, not the people. </i> MulhollandDrive-2/24/2004
12717LOL!!! good point!Jorj X Mckie-2/24/2004
12716He's definitely not a librarian.<g>Original Mad Dog-2/24/2004
12715in my mind, he chose the wrong vehicle with which express himself.Jorj X Mckie-2/24/2004
12714I agree with you that the Constitution shouldn't be used to take rights awayOriginal Mad Dog-2/24/2004
12713I am now officially in the anti-bush crowd. constitutional amendment to ban gayJorj X Mckie-2/24/2004
12712ROFL x 3....:-) And I thought I was the internet maven...........mph-2/23/2004
12711vogueknitting.comAlan Smithee-2/23/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):