SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Nasdaq 100 Analysis
An SI Board Since September 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
238 71 0
Emcee:  Steve Lee Type:  Moderated
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
13Steve, that was a superb, articulate post. <i>I have been saying for abouorkrious-12/2/2001
12I thought your recent newsletter discussing semiconductor valuation was a very wSteve Lee-12/2/2001
11Curious - what did you think of the valuation analysis for the semiconductor secRobert Scott-12/2/2001
10Great idea - I think it would be more useful, however, to use market cap to saleRobert Scott-11/28/2001
9That is a good idea, I would not use the "as soon" as cap became underZeev Hed-11/18/2001
8I am not necessarily saying the NDX 100 is mishandled, but that by its very natuSteve Lee-11/18/2001
7You can make a case that the QQQ should be adjusted more often, but once in the Zeev Hed-11/18/2001
6My point is they are not "declining" market caps, but already "deSteve Lee-11/18/2001
5Steve, I am not sure about the QQQ holders being "screwed", the procesZeev Hed-11/18/2001
4It seems it only gets manually reweighted once a year, and then I think it is bySteve Lee-11/18/2001
3Steve, also strange that AMAT with a market cap of $32 B does not make the top 1Zeev Hed-11/18/2001
2Header post has been updated with latest figures. This is the first time I haveSteve Lee-11/18/2001
1What vectorvest comes up with doing a similar analysis using a Price of the nasdGut Trader-9/11/2001
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):