SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Ralph Nader For President!
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
206 8 0
Emcee:  Elmer Flugum Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
131I think the issue in this election is which is more valuable: (1) removing Bushredfish-7/26/2004
130"Where I stand is simple. The two parties are being pulled 24-hours a day bThomas M.-7/12/2004
129Ralph's last great line (he appeared on the McEnroe show on CNBC the other nElmer Flugum-7/10/2004
128post-gazette.comcalgal-7/10/2004
127JakeStraw, Ralph is my man, but how can I risk another four years of George BusElmer Flugum-7/4/2004
126With sad choices like Kerry & Bush, Nader appears to be a good alternative..JakeStraw-6/30/2004
125I agree with you 100%. lenElmer Flugum-4/21/2004
124The Republic is in danger. A vote for Nader increases that danger.Kenneth E. Phillipps-4/21/2004
123I love the man, but we are in an extreme emergency situation with this present gElmer Flugum-4/17/2004
122Ralph is really out of step this time.Nicholas Thompson-3/7/2004
121RECKLESS DRIVER newyorker.com More than any other single person, Ralph Nader iElmer Flugum-3/7/2004
120Thanks for that Ray.. Although I missed the presentation (bless those UnitarianElmer Flugum-2/28/2004
119I had a couple of relatives who were keeping up with what the current boycotted Tom Clarke-2/27/2004
118For one thing, there was no internet then to remind people what produce was beinDMaA-2/27/2004
117I really liked this guy. Care to speculate on why movements such as his constantTom Clarke-2/27/2004
116Feb23rd transcript.. Question from Les Krepman with NBC News. You've chara~digs-2/27/2004
115Re: <i>I agree with his protest.</I> I thought it worthwhile that Raymond Duray-2/27/2004
114"PERFECTLY LEGAL" author on tour in Portland: amazon.com From my emRaymond Duray-2/27/2004
113This thought crossed my mind as well...I think Ralph wanted to be a factor in thElmer Flugum-2/25/2004
112Later in that article, Raimondo makes the point that Nader isn't really runnThomas M.-2/25/2004
111Ralph indeed is the answer, but who wants GW for another four years? Nader can Elmer Flugum-2/25/2004
110Just on foreign policy. TomThomas M.-2/23/2004
109So Raimondo is supporting Nader? He's come a long way from his paleo-libertaTom Clarke-2/23/2004
108<<< ... With the likely nomination of Kerry – or, worse, Edwards – thThomas M.-2/23/2004
107Why worry about nukes floating down the Columbia River when day in, day out, theElmer Flugum-2/21/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News